BDVL ranks 1st and JSTC 24th of 44 funds in the Global Active Equity Category.
BDVL vs JSTC
BDVL −0.50pt a year
0.39%0.89%
BDVL 10.3×the volume
236K22.9K
BDVL vs JSTC Performance
+9.7%+12.8%
- BDVL 0.39%, better
- JSTC 0.89%
- BDVL $1.77B
- JSTC $297M
- BDVL +9.7%
- JSTC +12.8%, better
- BDVL
- JSTC 1.22%
- BDVL 423
- JSTC 621
- BDVL 236K sh, better
- JSTC 22.9K sh
- BDVL $26.44
- JSTC $22.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BDVL | JSTC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79Higher | F19 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A80Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A89 | A92Higher |
| Durability | A93Higher | A73 |
Rank among Global Active Equity funds
Same Category. BDVL and JSTC are both graded against the same 44 Global Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BDVLA
JSTCC
In short
BDVL A global low-volatility fund with an active engine: a quant model picks roughly 500 stocks on low vol, quality and value, scored against MSCI's ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Fee: 0.39% net of a waiver through June 30, 2028.
JSTC Not an off-the-shelf ESG score. Adasina screens global companies against its own social justice criteria (racial, gender, economic, climate), then runs the book actively across every market cap.
Stated mandate
BDVL The Fund seeks risk-adjusted total return through active management of equity exposure, with a focus on managing volatility relative to the broad equity market.
JSTC The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income. It actively invests in global companies whose business practices align with Adasina’s social-justice criteria, including racial, gender, economic, and climate justice.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BDVL vs JSTC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BDVL vs JSTC Cost
Overpaying JSTC vs BDVL
$8,974
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BDVL 0.39%
$7,898
JSTC 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BDVL | JSTC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,576 | $871 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $5,953 | $3,228 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $16,872 | $8,974 |
- 0.39%BDVL, cheaper
- 0.89%JSTC
- Middle half of Global Active Equity funds
- Median 0.69%
BDVL 9th cheapest of 44 funds
JSTC 36th cheapest of 44 funds
BDVL vs JSTC Dividends
- BDVL
- JSTC 1.22%
- BDVL
- JSTC $0.28
- BDVL $0.22
- JSTC $0.10
- BDVL Jun 15, 2026
- JSTC Jun 29, 2026
- BDVL Jun 18, 2026
- JSTC Jun 30, 2026
- BDVL Twice a year
- JSTC Twice a year
Distribution history
BDVL vs JSTC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BDVL 8.7%JSTC 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BDVL 0.60JSTC 1.06
- Worst fall
- BDVL −7.7%JSTC −26.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BDVL 0.61JSTC 0.88
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.