BDVL ranks 1st and NXTE 41st of 44 funds in the Global Active Equity Category.
BDVL vs NXTE
BDVL −0.61pt a year
0.39%1.00%
BDVL 58.3×the volume
236K4.06K
BDVL vs NXTE Performance
+9.7%+9.9%
- BDVL 0.39%, better
- NXTE 1.00%
- BDVL $1.77B
- NXTE $48M
- BDVL +9.7%
- NXTE +9.9%, better
- BDVL
- NXTE 0.40%
- BDVL 423
- NXTE 57
- BDVL 236K sh, better
- NXTE 4.06K sh
- BDVL $26.44
- NXTE $44.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BDVL | NXTE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79Higher | F12 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A80Higher | F15 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | C46 |
| Durability | A93Higher | C42 |
Rank among Global Active Equity funds
Same Category. BDVL and NXTE are both graded against the same 44 Global Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BDVLA
NXTEF
In short
BDVL A global low-volatility fund with an active engine: a quant model picks roughly 500 stocks on low vol, quality and value, scored against MSCI's ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Fee: 0.39% net of a waiver through June 30, 2028.
NXTE A hand-picked, go-anywhere bet on companies the manager believes are building a sustainable economy. Active, global, and priced like a stock-picker rather than an index fund.
Stated mandate
BDVL The Fund seeks risk-adjusted total return through active management of equity exposure, with a focus on managing volatility relative to the broad equity market.
NXTE Seeks long-term capital appreciation by actively investing at least 80% of assets in sustainable companies selected for their contribution to sustainability objectives, above-average growth potential, and reasonable valuation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BDVL vs NXTE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BDVL vs NXTE Cost
Overpaying NXTE vs BDVL
$10,790
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BDVL 0.39%
$7,898
NXTE 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BDVL | NXTE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,763 | $1,058 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $6,625 | $3,900 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $18,688 | $10,790 |
- 0.39%BDVL, cheaper
- 1.00%NXTE
- Middle half of Global Active Equity funds
- Median 0.69%
BDVL 9th cheapest of 44 funds
NXTE 40th cheapest of 44 funds
BDVL vs NXTE Dividends
- BDVL
- NXTE 0.40%
- BDVL
- NXTE $0.18
- BDVL $0.22
- NXTE $0.12
- BDVL Jun 15, 2026
- NXTE Jun 25, 2026
- BDVL Jun 18, 2026
- NXTE Jun 29, 2026
- BDVL Twice a year
- NXTE Quarterly
Distribution history
BDVL vs NXTE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BDVL 8.7%NXTE 26.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BDVL 0.60NXTE 0.67
- Worst fall
- BDVL −7.7%NXTE −28.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BDVL 0.61NXTE 1.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.