ISWN ranks 3rd and BFAP 14th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
BFAP vs ISWN
ISWN −0.41pt a year
0.90%0.49%
ISWN 1.4×the volume
1.37K1.97K
BFAP vs ISWN Performance
−22.5%+2.4%
- BFAP 0.90%
- ISWN 0.49%, better
- BFAP $1M
- ISWN $35M
- BFAP −22.5%
- ISWN +2.4%, better
- BFAP
- ISWN 3.09%
- BFAP 5
- ISWN 14
- BFAP 1.37K sh
- ISWN 1.97K sh, better
- BFAP $15.74
- ISWN $21.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BFAP | ISWN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F12 | D39Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | C54Higher | C53 |
| Durability | C43 | A81Higher |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. BFAP and ISWN are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BFAPD
ISWNA
In short
BFAP Bitcoin with guardrails. BFAP wraps bitcoin-linked exposure in a defined-outcome structure: 15 points of downside protection plus an upside cap, both set for a one-year period starting each April. You give up the top of a rally for a cushion under the drop.
ISWN Most downside-protection funds pay for the cushion by capping your upside. ISWN skips the cap: roughly 90% sits in Treasuries while about 10% buys long-dated in-the-money calls on EFA, so developed-market exposure arrives through options.
Stated mandate
BFAP The Fund seeks to match the price return of a bitcoin-referencing asset up to a predetermined upside cap, while limiting its maximum loss from that reference instrument to 15% over the current target outcome period.
ISWN The fund seeks to track a rules-based index combining U.S. Treasury securities with EFA options. Its strategy targets approximately 90% Treasury exposure to cushion severe, rare market disruptions while retaining some participation in EFA gains.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BFAP vs ISWN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BFAP vs ISWN Cost
Overpaying BFAP vs ISWN
$7,248
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BFAP 0.90%
$17,040
ISWN 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BFAP | ISWN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $883 | $710 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $3,394 | $2,621 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $9,792 | $7,248 |
- 0.90%BFAP
- 0.49%ISWN, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
ISWN cheapest of 18 funds
BFAP 11th cheapest of 18 funds
BFAP vs ISWN Dividends
- BFAP
- ISWN 3.09%
- BFAP
- ISWN $0.65
- BFAP $3.44
- ISWN $0.17
- BFAP Dec 29, 2025
- ISWN Sep 29, 2026
- BFAP Dec 31, 2025
- ISWN Sep 30, 2026
- BFAP Irregular
- ISWN Quarterly
Distribution history
BFAP vs ISWN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BFAP 21.2%ISWN 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BFAP −0.50ISWN 0.54
- Worst fall
- BFAP −34.1%ISWN −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BFAP 1.07ISWN 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.