Skip to content

BFEB vs ZALT

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February

BFEBCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

0.3%by weight

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

BFEB0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 8.0×the volume

BFEB17.2KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

BFEB +7.3pt

BFEB+17.9%ZALT+10.6%

BFEB vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+12.4%BFEB+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BFEB +12.4%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BFEB 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
BFEB $204M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
BFEB +12.4%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
BFEB 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
BFEB 17.2K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
BFEB $53.79
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BFEB: Cost 40, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for BFEB, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBFEBZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC54A79Higher
Tradability15% weightA79HigherB65
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA90
Durability5% weightA74HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BFEB and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and BFEB 30th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 27CSIXFAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETFScore 55
  4. Rank 30CBFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  5. Rank 30BBSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BFEBCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

BFEB The February slot in Innovator's buffer lineup: FLEX options on SPY that absorb the first 9% of a decline over an approximately annual outcome period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside that resets every February.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

BFEB The Fund seeks to track SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during an approximately annual outcome period. It uses FLEX Options and may invest directly in the underlying ETF or its components.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • BFEB Absorbs the first 9% of SPY's losses (before fees) over an approximately annual outcome period, using FLEX options inside an ordinary 1940 Act fund rather than a bank note.innovatoretfs.com
  • The 0.79% expense ratio sits right at the median for shallow-buffer SPY funds. You pay the going rate for the structure, not a premium for the calendar month.
  • Terms reset on their own each February 1, so there is no options roll to manage and no maturity date to diarize.innovatoretfs.com
  • One of a monthly family running the same SPY buffer recipe (BJAN, BMAY, BJUL and others), so the start date isn't locked to a single point on the calendar.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • BFEB The cap is what pays for the buffer. Upside stops at a level set each February, and anything SPY earns above it is left on the table.
  • Headline terms apply to holders across a full outcome period. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap are left, not the stated 9%.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trades thinly next to the largest buffer funds, which tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads on the way in and out.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full BFEB profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

BFEB vs ZALT Holdings

How BFEB and ZALT differ

Overlap by weight

0.3%

Shared holdings make up 0.4% of ZALT and 0.3% of BFEB.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both0.3%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in BFEB and ZALT, widest gap first
SectorMore in BFEBMore in ZALT
TechnologyBFEB +1.4 points
CommunicationBFEB +0.8 points
FinancialsZALT +0.6 points
Health CareZALT +0.5 points
EnergyZALT +0.4 points
Consumer StaplesZALT +0.4 points
Consumer DiscretionaryZALT +0.3 points
IndustrialsBFEB +0.2 points
UtilitiesZALT +0.1 points
Real EstateZALT +0.1 points
MaterialsBFEB +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BFEB and ZALT, widest gap first
CountryMore in BFEBMore in ZALT
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BFEB101.3%
  • ZALT37.7%

Securities held

  • BFEB3
  • ZALT503

Asset class

BFEB
Equity
ZALT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BFEB2
  • In both1
  • Only in ZALT502

Only in BFEB

2 securities, 100% of BFEB by weight

  • Spy 01/29/2027 6.93 C99.90%
  • Spy 01/29/2027 691.98 P1.09%

Only in ZALT

502 securities, 100% of ZALT by weight

  • Apple Inc7.59%
  • NVIDIA Corp7.47%
  • Microsoft Corp5.85%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BFEB and ZALT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BFEBMore in ZALT
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037ZALT +0.16 points

All 6 BFEB holdings⁠All ZALT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BFEB vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying BFEB vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BFEB 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BFEB 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BFEB $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBFEBZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BFEB
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

BFEB 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BFEB vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BFEB None
ZALT None

Distribution history

BFEBAll BFEB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BFEB vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BFEB 8.2%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BFEB 1.53, betterZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BFEB −14.8%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BFEB 0.67ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • BFEBCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BFEBCvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BFEBCvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.