ZALT ranks 1st and BFEB 30th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
BFEB vs ZALT
0.3%by weight
ZALT −0.10pt a year
0.79%0.69%
ZALT 8.0×the volume
17.2K138K
BFEB +7.3pt
+17.9%+10.6%
BFEB vs ZALT Performance
+12.4%+7.1%
- BFEB 0.79%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- BFEB $204M
- ZALT $840M
- BFEB +12.4%, better
- ZALT +7.1%
- BFEB 3
- ZALT 503
- BFEB 17.2K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- BFEB $53.79
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BFEB | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | C54 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A79Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | A90 | |
| Durability | A74Higher | B61 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. BFEB and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BFEBC
ZALTA
In short
BFEB The February slot in Innovator's buffer lineup: FLEX options on SPY that absorb the first 9% of a decline over an approximately annual outcome period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside that resets every February.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
BFEB The Fund seeks to track SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during an approximately annual outcome period. It uses FLEX Options and may invest directly in the underlying ETF or its components.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BFEB vs ZALT Holdings
How BFEB and ZALT differ
0.3%
Shared holdings make up 0.4% of ZALT and 0.3% of BFEB.
Level by level
- Holdings0.3%
- Sector97.6%
Sector
| Sector | More in BFEBMore in ZALT | BFEB | ZALT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | BFEB +1.4 points | 40.1% | 38.7% |
| Communication | BFEB +0.8 points | 9.9% | 9.1% |
| Financials | ZALT +0.6 points | 11.3% | 11.9% |
| Health Care | ZALT +0.5 points | 9.4% | 9.9% |
| Energy | ZALT +0.4 points | 3.4% | 3.8% |
| Consumer Staples | ZALT +0.4 points | 4.4% | 4.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | ZALT +0.3 points | 8.7% | 9.0% |
| Industrials | BFEB +0.2 points | 7.6% | 7.4% |
| Utilities | ZALT +0.1 points | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Real Estate | ZALT +0.1 points | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Materials | BFEB +0.1 points | 1.6% | 1.5% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BFEBMore in ZALT | BFEB | ZALT |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- BFEB101.3%
- ZALT37.7%
- BFEB3
- ZALT503
Asset class
- BFEB
- Equity
- ZALT
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BFEB2
- In both1
- Only in ZALT502
Only in BFEB
2 securities, 100% of BFEB by weight
- Spy 01/29/2027 6.93 C99.90%
- Spy 01/29/2027 691.98 P1.09%
Only in ZALT
502 securities, 100% of ZALT by weight
- Apple Inc7.59%
- NVIDIA Corp7.47%
- Microsoft Corp5.85%
- Amazon.com Inc3.56%
- Spy 12/31/2026 762.61 P2.67%
- Alphabet Inc2.48%
- Broadcom Inc2.34%
- Meta Platforms Inc2.05%
- Alphabet Inc1.99%
- Eli Lilly & Co1.71%
- Tesla Inc1.70%
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.52%
- Micron Technology Inc1.51%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.42%
- Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.24%
- ExxonMobil Holdings Corp1.16%
- Visa Inc1.06%
- Johnson & Johnson0.99%
- Walmart Inc0.83%
- AbbVie Inc0.79%
- Mastercard Inc0.78%
- Chevron Corp0.70%
- Costco Wholesale Corp0.68%
- Palantir Technologies Inc0.64%
- Cisco Systems Inc0.62%
- Morgan Stanley0.59%
- Procter & Gamble Co/The0.57%
- Merck & Co Inc0.56%
- UnitedHealth Group Inc0.55%
- Coca-Cola Co/The0.55%
- Home Depot Inc/The0.50%
- Intel Corp0.49%
- Philip Morris International Inc0.49%
- Bank of America Corp0.49%
- Ge Aerospace0.47%
- Applied Materials Inc0.47%
- Lam Research Corp0.45%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc0.45%
- Caterpillar Inc0.43%
- Texas Instruments Inc0.41%
- RTX Corp0.41%
- Netflix Inc0.39%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc0.39%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc0.38%
- Wells Fargo & Co0.38%
- Amgen Inc0.38%
- International Business Machines Corp0.37%
- Linde PLC0.36%
- GE Vernova Inc0.34%
- Oracle Corp0.34%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in BFEBMore in ZALT | BFEB | ZALT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037 | ZALT +0.16 points | 0.28% | 0.44% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BFEB vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying BFEB vs ZALT
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BFEB 0.79%
$15,174
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BFEB | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,232 | $173 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $4,697 | $634 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $13,429 | $1,745 |
- 0.79%BFEB
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
BFEB 34th cheapest of 77 funds
BFEB vs ZALT Dividends
- BFEB None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
BFEB vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BFEB 8.2%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BFEB 1.53, betterZALT 1.50
- Worst fall
- BFEB −14.8%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BFEB 0.67ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.