CPRJ ranks 4th and BFJL 13th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
BFJL vs CPRJ
0.0%by weight
CPRJ −0.21pt a year
0.90%0.69%
CPRJ 37.1×the volume
38714.4K
BFJL vs CPRJ Performance
−5.8%+3.6%
- BFJL 0.90%
- CPRJ 0.69%, better
- BFJL $4M
- CPRJ $43M
- BFJL −5.8%
- CPRJ +3.6%, better
- BFJL 5
- CPRJ 3
- BFJL 387 sh
- CPRJ 14.4K sh, better
- BFJL $18.81
- CPRJ $27.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BFJL | CPRJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A78Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D29 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | D30 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | C48 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. BFJL and CPRJ are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BFJLD
CPRJA
In short
BFJL Bitcoin with a seatbelt. BFJL follows the price return of a bitcoin reference instrument, absorbs the first 15% of a decline over a one-year outcome period, and gives up gains above a cap that resets each July.
CPRJ Small caps with a hard floor. CPRJ tracks the Russell 2000 through IWM and aims to absorb 100% of its losses over a one-year outcome period, before fees, in exchange for a cap on gains that resets every July.
Stated mandate
BFJL The Fund seeks to match the price return of a bitcoin-linked reference asset, subject to a 27.82% upside cap, while limiting its maximum loss from reference-instrument losses to 15% over the July 1, 2026–July 9, 2027 Target Outcome Period.
CPRJ The Fund seeks participation in gains of the iShares Russell 2000 ETF up to a stated cap while protecting against 100% of its losses over the one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BFJL vs CPRJ Holdings
How BFJL and CPRJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BFJL and 0.0% of CPRJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BFJL and CPRJ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for BFJL and CPRJ.
Concentration
- BFJL1188.4%
- CPRJ101.5%
- BFJL4
- CPRJ0
Asset class
- BFJL
- Multi-Asset
- CPRJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BFJL4
- In both0
- Only in CPRJ0
Only in BFJL
4 securities, 100% of BFJL by weight
- 2027-07-09 S&P 500® Mini Index P 2,997.641158.92%
- 2027-07-09 iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF C 38.2825.49%
- 2027-07-09 iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF P 28.302.59%
- 2027-07-09 S&P 500® Mini Index C 2,810.29<0.01%
Only in CPRJ
0 securities, 0.0% of CPRJ by weight
Weight gaps
BFJL and CPRJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BFJL vs CPRJ Cost
Overpaying BFJL vs CPRJ
$3,611
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BFJL 0.90%
$17,040
CPRJ 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BFJL | CPRJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $1,232 | $361 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $4,697 | $1,318 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $13,429 | $3,611 |
- 0.90%BFJL
- 0.69%CPRJ, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
CPRJ 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
BFJL 11th cheapest of 18 funds
BFJL vs CPRJ Dividends
- BFJL
- CPRJ None
- BFJL $0.24
- CPRJ
- BFJL Dec 29, 2025
- CPRJ
- BFJL Dec 31, 2025
- CPRJ
- BFJL Irregular
- CPRJ
Distribution history
BFJL vs CPRJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BFJL 12.9%CPRJ 4.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BFJL −0.73CPRJ 0.02
- Worst fall
- BFJL −21.2%CPRJ −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BFJL 0.18CPRJ 0.27
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.