Skip to content
etf.net

BGDV vs DIVN

Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

BGDVBNYSE Arca

Horizon Dividend Income ETF

DIVNCCboe

Overlap

12.1%by weight

Expense ratio

BGDV −0.25pt a year

BGDV0.45%DIVN0.70%

Avg volume · 30D

DIVN 2.6×the volume

BGDV32.2KDIVN83K

BGDV vs DIVN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+18.9%BGDV+30.3%DIVN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BGDV +18.9%. DIVN +30.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%25%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BGDV 0.45%, better
DIVN 0.70%
Fund size
BGDV $878M
DIVN $350M
1Y total return
BGDV +18.9%
DIVN +30.3%, better
Yield (12M)
BGDV 0.94%
DIVN 4.09%, better
Holdings
BGDV 47
DIVN 101
Avg volume (30D)
BGDV 32.2K sh
DIVN 83K sh, better
NAV per share
BGDV $31.51
DIVN $32.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BGDV: Cost 73, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings 64, Durability 70. DIVN: Cost 18, Risk 80, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 46, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for BGDV, DIVN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBGDVDIVN
Cost30% weightA73HigherF18
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC44A80Higher
Tradability15% weightA81HigherB64
Holdings10% weightB64HigherC46
Durability5% weightA70HigherB67

Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BGDV and DIVN are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Dividend Income⁠

Category · 40 funds
See all 40 ›

BGDV ranks 4th and DIVN 22nd of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.

  1. Rank 1ACGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AHIDVAB US High Dividend ETFScore 73
  3. Rank 3ABGIGBahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BBGDVBahl & Gaynor Dividend ETFScore 67
  5. Rank 4BFDIVMarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETFScore 67
  6. Rank 19CGDIVHarbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV)Score 47
  7. Rank 22CDIVNHorizon Dividend Income ETFScore 46
  8. Rank 22CDIVZPolen Dividend Income ETFScore 46

BGDV vs DIVN Holdings

How BGDV and DIVN differ

Overlap by weight

12.1%

Shared holdings make up 23.3% of BGDV and 16.9% of DIVN.

Level by level

  • Holdings10 in both12.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors64.9%
  • Countryby domicile95.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in BGDV and DIVN, widest gap first
SectorMore in BGDVMore in DIVN
Consumer StaplesDIVN +16.6 points
TechnologyBGDV +16.0 points
EnergyDIVN +10.0 points
FinancialsBGDV +6.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryDIVN +5.8 points
IndustrialsBGDV +4.4 points
UtilitiesBGDV +3.3 points
Health CareDIVN +2.7 points
CommunicationBGDV +2.3 points
MaterialsBGDV +1.9 points
Real EstateBGDV +1.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BGDV and DIVN, widest gap first
CountryMore in BGDVMore in DIVN
TaiwanBGDV +4.8 points
United StatesDIVN +2.8 points
ChinaDIVN +1.0 points
SwitzerlandDIVN +0.9 points
IrelandDIVN +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BGDV35.1%
  • DIVN37.5%

Securities held

  • BGDV47
  • DIVN100

Asset class

BGDV
Equity
DIVN
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BGDV37
  • In both10
  • Only in DIVN90

Only in BGDV

37 securities, 76.7% of BGDV by weight

  • Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.77%
  • Eli Lilly & Co4.18%
  • Victory Capital Holdings Inc3.85%

Only in DIVN

90 securities, 83.0% of DIVN by weight

  • Philip Morris International Inc5.25%
  • Procter & Gamble Co/The4.81%
  • McDonald's Corp3.28%

Weight gaps

All 10 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BGDV and DIVN, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BGDVMore in DIVN
Chevron CorpCVXDIVN +3.72 points
Motorola Solutions IncMSIBGDV +2.90 points
Targa Resources CorpTRGPBGDV +2.04 points
Snap-on IncSNABGDV +1.69 points
Hartford Insurance Group Inc/TheHIGBGDV +1.47 points
Cboe Global Markets IncCBOEBGDV +1.45 points
Waste Management IncWMBGDV +1.25 points
AbbVie IncABBVDIVN +1.09 points

All 47 BGDV holdings⁠All 102 DIVN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BGDV vs DIVN Cost

Overpaying DIVN vs BGDV

$4,565

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BGDV 0.45%

    $9,041

  • DIVN 0.70%

    $13,606

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BGDV 0.45%
  • DIVN 0.70%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530DIVN $13,606BGDV $9,041

Year by year

YearBGDVDIVNOverpaying
10$812$1,250$438
20$3,128$4,760$1,632
30$9,041$13,606$4,565

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%BGDV, cheaper
  • 0.70%DIVN
  • Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
  • Median 0.50%

BGDV 9th cheapest of 40 funds

DIVN 33rd cheapest of 40 funds

BGDV vs DIVN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BGDV 0.94%
DIVN 4.09%, better
Payout (12M)
BGDV $0.29
DIVN $1.31
Last payment
BGDV $0.02
DIVN $0.10
Ex-dividend
BGDV Oct 29, 2026
DIVN Oct 29, 2026
Paid on
BGDV Pays Nov 2, 2026
DIVN Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
BGDV Monthly
DIVN Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

BGDVMonthly · 23 paymentsAll BGDV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 31, 2024 $0.02; Jan 30, 2025 $0.01; Feb 27, 2025 $0.01; Mar 28, 2025 $0.05; Apr 29, 2025 $0.02; May 29, 2025 $0.02; Jun 27, 2025 $0.04; Jul 30, 2025 $0.02; Aug 28, 2025 $0.02; Sep 29, 2025 $0.04; Oct 30, 2025 $0.02; Nov 26, 2025 $0.02; Dec 31, 2025 $0.04; Jan 29, 2026 $0.0066; Feb 26, 2026 $0.02; Mar 26, 2026 $0.05; Apr 29, 2026 $0.01; May 28, 2026 $0.02; Jun 29, 2026 $0.02; Jul 30, 2026 $0.02; Aug 28, 2026 $0.02; Sep 29, 2026 $0.02; Oct 29, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
DIVNMonthly · 10 paymentsAll DIVN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Aug 22, 2025 $0.06; Dec 24, 2025 $0.33; Feb 27, 2026 $0.13; Apr 27, 2026 $0.30; May 28, 2026 $0.09; Jun 29, 2026 $0.11; Jul 27, 2026 $0.08; Aug 26, 2026 $0.07; Sep 25, 2026 $0.11; Oct 29, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

BGDV vs DIVN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BGDV 11.4%since Jan 2025DIVN 12.2%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BGDV 1.00since Jan 2025DIVN 1.57since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BGDV −14.8%since Dec 2024DIVN −5.5%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BGDV 0.69DIVN 0.13

Popular comparisons

  • BGDVBvsCGDVA

    Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DIVNCvsCGDVA

    Horizon Dividend Income ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BGDVBvsHIDVA

    Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DIVNCvsHIDVA

    Horizon Dividend Income ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • BGDVBvsBGIGA

    Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DIVNCvsBGIGA

    Horizon Dividend Income ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.