BGDV vs TGLR: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

BGDVBNYSE Arca

Wedbush Laffer Tengler New Era Value ETF

TGLRDNYSE Arca

Overlap

26.4%by weight

Expense ratio

BGDV −0.40pt a year

BGDV0.45%TGLR0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

BGDV 7.9×the volume

BGDV32.2KTGLR4.07K

BGDV vs TGLR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+19.0%BGDV+9.3%TGLR

Expense ratio: BGDV 0.45%, better; TGLR 0.85%
Fund size: BGDV $870M; TGLR $35M
1Y total return: BGDV +19.0%, better; TGLR +9.3%
Yield (12M): BGDV 0.94%; TGLR 0.97%, better
Holdings: BGDV 47; TGLR 30
Avg volume (30D): BGDV 32.2K sh, better; TGLR 4.07K sh
NAV per share: BGDV $31.23; TGLR $38.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for BGDV, TGLR, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	BGDV	TGLR
Cost30% weight	A73Higher	F10
Mission25% weight	Not scored	A71
Risk15% weight	C44Higher	D28
Tradability15% weight	A81Higher	B60
Holdings10% weight	B64Higher	D36
Durability5% weight	A70Higher	B57

Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. BGDV and TGLR are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Dividend Income⁠

Category · 40 funds

See all 40 ›

BGDV ranks 4th and TGLR 35th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.

Rank 1ACGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETFScore 76
Rank 2AHIDVAB US High Dividend ETFScore 73
Rank 3ABGIGBahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETFScore 70
Rank 4BBGDVBahl & Gaynor Dividend ETFScore 67
Rank 4BFDIVMarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETFScore 67
Rank 33DROPECoastal Compass 100 ETFScore 33
Rank 35DTGLRWedbush Laffer Tengler New Era Value ETFScore 30
Rank 36DDIVEDana Concentrated Dividend ETFScore 29

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BGDVBBahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

TGLRDWedbush Laffer Tengler New Era Value ETF

In short

BGDV No data

TGLR Named for Nancy Tengler's 2003 book, TGLR runs her Relative Dividend Yield playbook: 25 to 35 US large caps bought when their own yield history flags them as cheap, held with low turnover, for 0.85%.

Stated mandate

BGDV No data

TGLR The Fund seeks income and long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

BGDV No data

TGLR Relative Dividend Yield and Relative Price-to-Sales flag the entry point; a 12-factor fundamental check, half qualitative, then weeds out stocks that are cheap for a reason.sec.gov
A 25 to 35 stock portfolio, so individual picks actually move the needle, paired with a stated aim of above-market dividend yield and low turnover.sec.gov
Portfolio manager Nancy Tengler, CEO and CIO of Laffer Tengler Investments, kept the reins when the fund reorganized into the Wedbush Series Trust in April 2026.sec.gov

Worth knowing

BGDV No data

TGLR At 0.85% it costs more than the typical fund in its dividend-income category, and more than peers like VUS at 0.25% and CGDV at 0.33%.
A small, thinly traded fund, which tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads than on the category's giants.
Income has arrived on an irregular schedule rather than a fixed monthly or quarterly cadence.

Full BGDV profile⁠

Full TGLR profile⁠

BGDV vs TGLR Holdings

How BGDV and TGLR differ

Overlap by weight

26.4%

Shared holdings make up 44.1% of TGLR and 26.9% of BGDV.

Level by level

Holdings12 in both26.4%
Sector11 Sectors86.0%
Countryby domicile95.2%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in BGDV and TGLR, widest gap first
Sector	More in BGDVMore in TGLR	BGDV	TGLR
Consumer Discretionary	TGLR +8.2 points	4.9%	13.1%
Health Care	BGDV +4.1 points	12.9%	8.8%
Technology	BGDV +3.3 points	27.9%	24.6%
Financials	BGDV +3.2 points	18.4%	15.2%
Consumer Staples	TGLR +2.4 points	2.3%	4.7%
Utilities	BGDV +2.0 points	4.1%	2.1%
Communication	BGDV +1.5 points	5.2%	3.7%
Real Estate	TGLR +1.0 points	1.1%	2.1%
Energy	TGLR +0.9 points	6.7%	7.6%
Materials	TGLR +0.8 points	2.2%	3.0%
Industrials	TGLR +0.6 points	14.3%	15.0%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BGDV and TGLR, widest gap first
Country	More in BGDVMore in TGLR	BGDV	TGLR
Taiwan	BGDV +4.8 points	4.8%	0.0%
United States	TGLR +3.1 points	95.2%	98.3%
Canada	TGLR +1.7 points	0.0%	1.7%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

BGDV34.7%
TGLR43.8%

Securities held

BGDV47
TGLR30

Asset class

BGDV: Equity
TGLR: Equity

Holdings

Only in BGDV35
In both12
Only in TGLR18

Only in BGDV

35 securities, 73.1% of BGDV by weight

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.44%
Eli Lilly & Co4.33%
Victory Capital Holdings Inc3.90%
Motorola Solutions Inc3.39%
Encompass Health Corp3.35%
UnitedHealth Group Inc2.95%
Cintas Corp2.89%
Amphenol Corp2.76%
Targa Resources Corp2.72%
Reinsurance Group of America Inc2.57%
Waste Management Inc2.45%
Reliance Inc2.34%
Hartford Insurance Group Inc/The2.20%
Snap-on Inc2.13%
Cboe Global Markets Inc2.04%
Parker-Hannifin Corp2.04%
NextEra Energy Inc1.95%
Western Digital Corp1.86%
Hubbell Inc1.85%
Analog Devices Inc1.85%
Carrier Global Corp1.84%
Ferrari NV1.83%
Travelers Cos Inc/The1.82%
Mondelez International Inc1.74%
CME Group Inc1.50%
Apollo Global Management Inc1.28%
CMS Energy Corp1.23%
Sempra1.23%
Ge Aerospace1.21%
KKR & Co Inc1.15%
Welltower Inc1.08%
Accenture PLC1.04%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.80%
Kla Corp0.76%
Evercore Inc0.58%

Only in TGLR

18 securities, 55.9% of TGLR by weight

American Express Co USD 0.24.90%
Rtx Corporation USD 1.04.31%
Johnson & Johnson USD 1.04.06%
Lam Resh Corp USD 0.0013.82%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc USD 0.013.67%
Cisco Sys Inc USD 0.0013.61%
Starbucks Com USD0.0013.51%
Apple Inc USD 0.000013.37%
Amazon Com Inc USD 0.013.30%
Steel Dynamics Inc USD 0.0053.07%
Emerson El Com USD0.503.02%
Oracle Corp USD 0.012.51%
Deere & Co USD 1.02.38%
Mcdonalds Corp USD 0.012.34%
Brookfield Asset Mgmt Ltd Npv2.27%
Micron Technology Inc USD 0.12.06%
Ge Vernova Inc USD 0.012.06%
Dreyfus Tr & AG Csh Mgmt-Ins1.64%

Weight gaps

All 12 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BGDV and TGLR, widest gap first
Holding	More in BGDVMore in TGLR	BGDV	TGLR
Walmart IncWMT	TGLR +3.60 points	0.80%	4.40%
Microsoft CorpMSFT	TGLR +2.51 points	2.59%	5.10%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.JPM	TGLR +2.35 points	2.33%	4.68%
Chevron CorpCVX	TGLR +1.73 points	1.74%	3.47%
Home Depot Inc/TheHD	TGLR +1.56 points	1.34%	2.90%
AbbVie IncABBV	TGLR +1.52 points	3.48%	5.00%
TJX Cos Inc/TheTJX	TGLR +1.23 points	1.93%	3.16%
Alphabet IncGOOGL	TGLR +1.01 points	1.91%	2.92%
Broadcom IncAVGO	TGLR +0.88 points	2.99%	3.87%
Williams Cos Inc/TheWMB	TGLR +0.72 points	2.54%	3.26%
NVIDIA CorpNVDA	TGLR +0.63 points	3.02%	3.65%
Meta Platforms IncMETA	BGDV +0.54 points	2.23%	1.69%

All 47 BGDV holdings⁠All TGLR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BGDV vs TGLR Cost

Overpaying TGLR vs BGDV

$7,158

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

BGDV 0.45%
$9,041
TGLR 0.85%
$16,199

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

BGDV 0.45%
TGLR 0.85%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	BGDV	TGLR	Overpaying
10	$812	$1,508	$696
20	$3,128	$5,706	$2,578
30	$9,041	$16,199	$7,158

Expense ratio

0.45%BGDV, cheaper
0.85%TGLR

BGDV0.45%TGLR0.85%

0.25%0.99%

Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
Median 0.50%

BGDV 9th cheapest of 40 funds

TGLR 35th cheapest of 40 funds

BGDV vs TGLR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026

Yield (12M): BGDV 0.94%; TGLR 0.97%, better
Payout (12M): BGDV $0.29; TGLR $0.38
Last payment: BGDV $0.02; TGLR $0.07
Ex-dividend: BGDV Oct 29, 2026; TGLR Sep 23, 2026
Paid on: BGDV Nov 2, 2026; TGLR Sep 29, 2026
Frequency: BGDV Monthly; TGLR Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BGDVMonthly · 23 paymentsAll BGDV payments⁠

TGLRQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll TGLR payments⁠

BGDV vs TGLR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: BGDV 11.4%since Jan 2025TGLR 12.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: BGDV 1.00since Jan 2025TGLR 1.33
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: BGDV −14.8%since Dec 2024TGLR −19.8%since Aug 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: BGDV 0.69TGLR 0.93; Market = 1

BGDV and TGLR in the news

All news⁠

ETF Filings
Wedbush files a 40-stock Central and Eastern Europe ETF with Trigon
Sep 15, 2026TGLR

Popular comparisons

BGDVBvsCGDVA
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.45% · 0.33%
Category
TGLRDvsCGDVA
Wedbush Laffer Tengler New Era Value ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.33%
Category
BGDVBvsHIDVA
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF
Expense ratio
0.45% · 0.35%
Category
TGLRDvsHIDVA
Wedbush Laffer Tengler New Era Value ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.35%
Category
BGDVBvsBGIGA
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
Expense ratio
0.45% · 0.45%
Category
TGLRDvsBGIGA
Wedbush Laffer Tengler New Era Value ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.45%
Category

BGDV vs TGLR

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How BGDV and TGLR differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in BGDV

Only in TGLR

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Wedbush files a 40-stock Central and Eastern Europe ETF with Trigon