IBUF ranks 3rd and BGLD 8th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
BGLD vs IBUF
IBUF −0.06pt a year
0.91%0.85%
BGLD 1.2×the volume
21.3K18K
BGLD vs IBUF Performance
−4.6%+9.8%
- BGLD 0.91%
- IBUF 0.85%, better
- BGLD $53M
- IBUF $121M
- BGLD −4.6%
- IBUF +9.8%, better
- BGLD 47.63%
- IBUF
- BGLD 3
- IBUF 3
- BGLD 21.3K sh, better
- IBUF 18K sh
- BGLD $15.91
- IBUF $31.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGLD | IBUF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | D39Higher |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | F21 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A84Higher | A80 |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. BGLD and IBUF are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGLDD
IBUFB
In short
BGLD Buffer ETFs almost always wrap stocks. BGLD wraps gold: it aims to track the SPDR Gold Trust's price up to a cap reset every quarter, while cushioning a slice of GLD's losses once the first 5% is gone.
IBUF Most buffer ETFs aim at the S&P 500. IBUF looks overseas, using the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF as its reference and buffering the first 10% of losses over each quarterly outcome period, with upside capped in return.
Stated mandate
BGLD The fund seeks to match the price return of the SPDR® Gold Trust, before fees and expenses, subject to a predetermined upside cap and protection against specified losses during the target outcome period.
IBUF The Fund uses a quarterly defined-outcome strategy based on the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF. It seeks to provide gains up to a cap while buffering the first 10% of reference-asset losses for investors holding through the full outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGLD vs IBUF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGLD vs IBUF Cost
Overpaying BGLD vs IBUF
$1,008
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGLD 0.91%
$17,207
IBUF 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGLD | IBUF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,610 | $1,508 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,076 | $5,706 | $370 |
| 30 | $17,207 | $16,199 | $1,008 |
- 0.91%BGLD
- 0.85%IBUF, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
IBUF 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
BGLD 8th cheapest of 9 funds
BGLD vs IBUF Dividends
- BGLD 47.63%
- IBUF
- BGLD $7.58
- IBUF None
- BGLD $7.58
- IBUF
- BGLD Dec 29, 2025
- IBUF
- BGLD Dec 31, 2025
- IBUF
- BGLD Annual
- IBUF
Distribution history
BGLD vs IBUF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGLD 10.6%IBUF 4.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BGLD 1.09IBUF 1.40
- Worst fall
- BGLD −15.4%IBUF −5.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BGLD 0.11IBUF 0.14
Popular comparisons
- 0.91% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.91% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.91% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.