XHLF ranks 4th and BILZ 20th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
BILZ vs XHLF
XHLF −0.11pt a year
0.14%0.03%
XHLF 1.5×the volume
200K309K
BILZ +0.1pt
+4.5%+4.4%
BILZ vs XHLF Performance
+3.7%+3.6%
- BILZ 0.14%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- BILZ $860M
- XHLF $2.03B
- BILZ +3.7%, better
- XHLF +3.6%
- BILZ 3.80%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- BILZ 5
- XHLF 29
- BILZ 200K sh
- XHLF 309K sh, better
- BILZ $100.94
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BILZ | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C44 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | A76 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | D38Higher | D35 |
| Durability | B58 | B59Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. BILZ and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BILZA
XHLFA
In short
BILZ Nearly everything in this corner of the market just tracks a T-bill index. BILZ instead hands the ultra-short government paper to PIMCO's bond desk, chasing maximum current income while preserving capital and daily liquidity. Pays monthly.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
BILZ The Fund seeks maximum current income while preserving capital and maintaining daily liquidity.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BILZ vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BILZ vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying BILZ vs XHLF
$2,294
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BILZ 0.14%
$2,932
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BILZ | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $256 | $55 | $201 |
| 20 | $1,000 | $216 | $784 |
| 30 | $2,932 | $638 | $2,294 |
- 0.14%BILZ
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
BILZ 20th cheapest of 78 funds
BILZ vs XHLF Dividends
- BILZ 3.80%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- BILZ $3.84
- XHLF $1.89
- BILZ $0.31
- XHLF $0.15
- BILZ Oct 1, 2026
- XHLF Oct 1, 2026
- BILZ Oct 5, 2026
- XHLF Oct 6, 2026
- BILZ Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
BILZ vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BILZ 0.2%, betterXHLF 0.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BILZ −0.52XHLF −0.52Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- BILZ −0.5%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BILZ 0.005XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.14% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.