Skip to content

BILZ vs XHLF

PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund

BILZANYSE Arca

BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF

XHLFANYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

XHLF −0.11pt a year

BILZ0.14%XHLF0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

XHLF 1.5×the volume

BILZ200KXHLF309K

3Y return · a year

BILZ +0.1pt

BILZ+4.5%XHLF+4.4%

BILZ vs XHLF Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+3.7%BILZ+3.6%XHLF

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BILZ +3.7%. XHLF +3.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BILZ 0.14%
XHLF 0.03%, better
Fund size
BILZ $860M
XHLF $2.03B
1Y total return
BILZ +3.7%, better
XHLF +3.6%
Yield (12M)
BILZ 3.80%, better
XHLF 3.75%
Holdings
BILZ 5
XHLF 29
Avg volume (30D)
BILZ 200K sh
XHLF 309K sh, better
NAV per share
BILZ $100.94
XHLF $50.29
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BILZ: Cost 76, Risk 44, Mission 100, Tradability 76, Holdings 38, Durability 58. XHLF: Cost 99, Risk 47, Mission 100, Tradability 79, Holdings 35, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for BILZ, XHLF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBILZXHLF
Cost30% weightA76A99Higher
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC44C47Higher
Tradability15% weightA76A79Higher
Holdings10% weightD38HigherD35
Durability5% weightB58B59Higher

Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BILZ and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Cash & Ultra-Short Income⁠

Category · 78 funds
See all 78 ›

XHLF ranks 4th and BILZ 20th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.

  1. Rank 4AVBILVanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 4AXHLFBondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 7ASGOViShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETFScore 79
  4. Rank 19AJPSTJPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETFScore 73
  5. Rank 20ABILZPIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 72
  6. Rank 20AGSSTGoldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETFScore 72

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BILZAPIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund

XHLFABondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF

In short

BILZ Nearly everything in this corner of the market just tracks a T-bill index. BILZ instead hands the ultra-short government paper to PIMCO's bond desk, chasing maximum current income while preserving capital and daily liquidity. Pays monthly.

XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.

Stated mandate

BILZ The Fund seeks maximum current income while preserving capital and maintaining daily liquidity.

XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.

Why people hold it

  • BILZ Active, not an index tracker: PIMCO's managers pick the short government paper, and the fund has stuck closely to its stated mandate.
  • Pays monthly, on a mandate built around preserving capital and keeping daily liquidity. Cash-adjacent plumbing rather than a rate bet.
  • The 0.14% expense ratio sits right at the median for its T-bill peer group, level with BIL, the big passive incumbent.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund with steady two-way trading, built up since a 2023 launch.
  • XHLF Costs 0.03% a year, against a typical short-Treasury peer near 0.14%. In cash-like funds, where returns come from bills everyone owns, fee is the main lever.
  • Tracks an index built to hold an average duration of roughly six months, rebalanced monthly, so exposure stays anchored instead of drifting as bills mature.bondbloxxetf.com
  • Sits in the gap between 0-3 month bill funds and one-year funds. Its sibling XONE targets a one-year duration at the same 0.03%, so the two can be mixed to dial in duration.
  • US Treasury bills only, no credit bets hiding in the portfolio, run in a multi-billion-dollar fund that has stayed close to its index.

Worth knowing

  • BILZ Index rivals undercut it: XONE charges 0.03% and VBIL 0.06% against 0.14% here. That gap is what active management costs.
  • Active means no plain bill index to check it against. Maturity and security mix ride on the manager's calls.
  • Launched in 2023, so its record covers only one slice of the rate cycle, and it sits in the lower half of its peer group.
  • XHLF Six months of duration is not zero. Prices move a touch more when yields shift than in 0-3 month bill funds such as BIL or CLIP.
  • Income rides whatever Treasury bills happen to pay, and distributions arrive on an irregular rhythm rather than a fixed amount or schedule.
  • Volume is moderate next to the largest bill ETFs, so spreads can be a bit wider, which matters more on big tickets than small ones.

Full BILZ profile⁠

Full XHLF profile⁠

BILZ vs XHLF Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BILZ vs XHLF Cost

Overpaying BILZ vs XHLF

$2,294

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BILZ 0.14%

    $2,932

  • XHLF 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BILZ 0.14%
  • XHLF 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K051015202530BILZ $2,932XHLF $638

Year by year

YearBILZXHLFOverpaying
10$256$55$201
20$1,000$216$784
30$2,932$638$2,294

Expense ratio

  • 0.14%BILZ
  • 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
  • Median 0.18%

XHLF cheapest of 78 funds

BILZ 20th cheapest of 78 funds

BILZ vs XHLF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BILZ 3.80%, better
XHLF 3.75%
Payout (12M)
BILZ $3.84
XHLF $1.89
Last payment
BILZ $0.31
XHLF $0.15
Ex-dividend
BILZ Oct 1, 2026
XHLF Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
BILZ Oct 5, 2026
XHLF Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
BILZ Monthly
XHLF Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BILZMonthly · 39 paymentsAll BILZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Aug 1, 2023 $0.40; Sep 1, 2023 $0.40; Oct 2, 2023 $0.28; Nov 1, 2023 $0.47; Dec 1, 2023 $0.28; Dec 28, 2023 $0.40; Feb 1, 2024 $0.41; Mar 1, 2024 $0.40; Apr 1, 2024 $0.43; May 1, 2024 $0.46; Jun 3, 2024 $0.43; Jul 1, 2024 $0.41; Aug 1, 2024 $0.49; Sep 3, 2024 $0.40; Oct 1, 2024 $0.38; Nov 1, 2024 $0.38; Dec 2, 2024 $0.40; Dec 31, 2024 $0.41; Feb 3, 2025 $0.33; Mar 3, 2025 $0.30; Apr 1, 2025 $0.35; May 1, 2025 $0.32; Jun 2, 2025 $0.38; Jul 1, 2025 $0.36; Aug 1, 2025 $0.37; Sep 2, 2025 $0.37; Oct 1, 2025 $0.40; Nov 3, 2025 $0.38; Dec 1, 2025 $0.34; Dec 31, 2025 $0.32; Feb 2, 2026 $0.32; Mar 2, 2026 $0.31; Apr 1, 2026 $0.31; May 1, 2026 $0.31; Jun 1, 2026 $0.31; Jul 1, 2026 $0.31; Aug 3, 2026 $0.31; Sep 1, 2026 $0.31; Oct 1, 2026 $0.31. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
XHLFMonthly · 45 paymentsAll XHLF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 45 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Feb 1, 2023 $0.15; Mar 1, 2023 $0.14; Apr 3, 2023 $0.17; May 1, 2023 $0.14; Jun 1, 2023 $0.22; Jul 3, 2023 $0.15; Aug 1, 2023 $0.21; Sep 1, 2023 $0.22; Oct 2, 2023 $0.19; Nov 1, 2023 $0.22; Dec 1, 2023 $0.21; Dec 28, 2023 $0.23; Feb 1, 2024 $0.23; Mar 1, 2024 $0.20; Apr 1, 2024 $0.22; May 1, 2024 $0.21; Jun 3, 2024 $0.22; Jul 1, 2024 $0.21; Aug 1, 2024 $0.21; Sep 3, 2024 $0.21; Oct 1, 2024 $0.20; Nov 1, 2024 $0.20; Dec 2, 2024 $0.19; Dec 30, 2024 $0.19; Feb 3, 2025 $0.17; Mar 3, 2025 $0.17; Apr 1, 2025 $0.18; May 1, 2025 $0.15; Jun 2, 2025 $0.17; Jul 1, 2025 $0.16; Aug 1, 2025 $0.16; Sep 2, 2025 $0.17; Oct 1, 2025 $0.16; Nov 3, 2025 $0.20; Dec 1, 2025 $0.14; Dec 30, 2025 $0.16; Feb 2, 2026 $0.16; Mar 2, 2026 $0.14; Apr 1, 2026 $0.16; May 1, 2026 $0.15; Jun 1, 2026 $0.15; Jul 1, 2026 $0.15; Aug 3, 2026 $0.15; Sep 1, 2026 $0.16; Oct 1, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

BILZ vs XHLF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BILZ 0.2%, betterXHLF 0.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BILZ −0.52XHLF −0.52Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BILZ −0.5%since Jun 2023XHLF −0.1%since Sep 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BILZ 0.005XHLF 0.03

Popular comparisons

  • BILZAvsICSHA

    PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund · iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XHLFAvsICSHA

    BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF · iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BILZAvsCLIPA

    PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XHLFAvsCLIPA

    BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF · Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BILZAvsVUSBA

    PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XHLFAvsVUSBA

    BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF · Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.