Skip to content

BJAN vs ZALT

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BJANCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

BJAN0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 7.6×the volume

BJAN17.9KZALT135K

3Y return · a year

BJAN +7.4pt

BJAN+17.4%ZALT+10.0%

BJAN vs ZALT Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+12.9%BJAN+7.7%ZALT

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. BJAN +12.9%. ZALT +7.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BJAN 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
BJAN $338M
ZALT $835M
1Y total return
BJAN +12.9%, better
ZALT +7.7%
Yield (12M)
BJAN 0.00%
ZALT No data
Holdings
BJAN 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
BJAN 17.9K sh
ZALT 135K sh, better
NAV per share
BJAN $59.06
ZALT $34.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BJAN: Cost 40, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 82, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 73, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for BJAN, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBJANZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC51A73Higher
Tradability15% weightA82HigherB65
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA89
Durability5% weightA82HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BJAN and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and BJAN 26th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 76
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 66
  3. Rank 24BSIXFAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETFScore 56
  4. Rank 26CBJANInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 26BBSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BJANCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

BJAN A written-down deal instead of a forecast: BJAN absorbs the first 9% of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over a one-year outcome period that resets every January, and gives up upside above a cap in exchange. It has run that same playbook since 2019.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

BJAN The Fund seeks to match the return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated upside cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the applicable outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • BJAN The terms are spelled out in the prospectus, not implied: first 9% of reference losses absorbed, upside capped, one-year outcome period starting each January.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trading since January 2019, so the January series has rolled through real market cycles rather than arriving on the back of a model.
  • The 0.79% expense ratio sits right at the median for buffer funds built on the same reference, so you are paying the going rate for the structure.
  • Stands in the upper half of its buffer-fund peer group, with a long operating record doing the most to hold it there.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • BJAN The cap is reset each January and set by option pricing at the time. Buy mid-period and you get the buffer and upside that remain, not the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trades lightly next to the busiest buffer funds, which can mean wider spreads. Limit orders do more work here than in a mega-cap index fund.
  • Cheaper routes to a similar trade exist in the same cohort: BUFB ladders buffers across months at 0.10%, ZALT runs a quarterly reset at 0.69%.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full BJAN profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

BJAN vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BJAN vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying BJAN vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BJAN 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BJAN 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BJAN $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBJANZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BJAN
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

BJAN 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BJAN vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
BJAN 0.00%
ZALT No data
Payout (12M)
BJAN None
ZALT None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

BJAN1 paymentAll BJAN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $1.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12019
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BJAN vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BJAN 8.6%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BJAN 1.55, betterZALT 1.51
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BJAN −17.4%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BJAN 0.72ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • BJANCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJANCvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJANCvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.