ZALT ranks 1st and BJAN 26th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
BJAN vs ZALT
ZALT −0.10pt a year
0.79%0.69%
ZALT 7.6×the volume
17.9K135K
BJAN +7.4pt
+17.4%+10.0%
BJAN vs ZALT Performance
+12.9%+7.7%
- BJAN 0.79%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- BJAN $338M
- ZALT $835M
- BJAN +12.9%, better
- ZALT +7.7%
- BJAN 0.00%
- ZALT
- BJAN 3
- ZALT 503
- BJAN 17.9K sh
- ZALT 135K sh, better
- BJAN $59.06
- ZALT $34.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BJAN | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | C51 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | A89 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | B61 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. BJAN and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BJANC
ZALTA
In short
BJAN A written-down deal instead of a forecast: BJAN absorbs the first 9% of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over a one-year outcome period that resets every January, and gives up upside above a cap in exchange. It has run that same playbook since 2019.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
BJAN The Fund seeks to match the return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated upside cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the applicable outcome period.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BJAN vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BJAN vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying BJAN vs ZALT
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BJAN 0.79%
$15,174
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BJAN | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,232 | $173 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $4,697 | $634 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $13,429 | $1,745 |
- 0.79%BJAN
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
BJAN 34th cheapest of 77 funds
BJAN vs ZALT Dividends
- BJAN 0.00%
- ZALT
- BJAN None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
BJAN vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BJAN 8.6%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BJAN 1.55, betterZALT 1.51
- Worst fall
- BJAN −17.4%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BJAN 0.72ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.