Skip to content

BJUL vs ZALT

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BJULBCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

BJUL0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 4.9×the volume

BJUL28.5KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

BJUL +7.0pt

BJUL+17.6%ZALT+10.6%

BJUL vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.8%BJUL+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BJUL +9.8%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BJUL 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
BJUL $357M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
BJUL +9.8%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
BJUL 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
BJUL 28.5K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
BJUL $55.16
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BJUL: Cost 40, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings not scored, Durability 83. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for BJUL, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBJULZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC42A79Higher
Tradability15% weightA84HigherB65
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA90
Durability5% weightA83HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BJUL and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and BJUL 32nd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 32CAUGTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 32BBJULInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 34CBAPRInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BJULBInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

BJUL Running since 2018, BJUL keeps a July clock: it absorbs the first 9% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's losses over each 12-month outcome period, in exchange for a cap on the upside.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

BJUL BJUL seeks to match the return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to an upside cap, while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the annual outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • BJUL The deal in one line: the first 9% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's decline is absorbed over the outcome period, and gains above a cap set at each July reset are given up.
  • Live since 2018, so it carries many completed annual resets rather than a single-cycle history, which is rare in a category mostly built after it.
  • Among dozens of shallow-buffer funds wrapped around the same S&P 500 ETF, this one lands in the upper half of the group on our review.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • BJUL The 9% cushion and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you get whatever protection and upside room remain, not the headline terms.
  • At 0.79% a year it sits right at the buffer-fund median, and relatives like ZALT (0.69%) and the laddered BUFB (0.10%) run cheaper.
  • Volume is light, so spreads deserve a look before trading, and regular distributions are not part of the package; the payoff shows up in the share price.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full BJUL profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

BJUL vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BJUL vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying BJUL vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BJUL 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BJUL $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBJULZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BJUL
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

BJUL 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BJUL vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BJUL None
ZALT None

Distribution history

BJULAll BJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BJUL vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BJUL 8.3%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BJUL 1.47ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BJUL −14.1%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BJUL 0.65ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • BJULBvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJULBvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJULBvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.