Skip to content

BJUN vs ZALT

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BJUNCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

BJUN0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 4.3×the volume

BJUN31.2KZALT135K

3Y return · a year

BJUN +4.0pt

BJUN+14.0%ZALT+10.0%

BJUN vs ZALT Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+7.4%BJUN+7.7%ZALT

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. BJUN +7.4%. ZALT +7.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%4%10%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BJUN 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
BJUN $239M
ZALT $835M
1Y total return
BJUN +7.4%
ZALT +7.7%, better
Holdings
BJUN 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
BJUN 31.2K sh
ZALT 135K sh, better
NAV per share
BJUN $48.34
ZALT $34.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BJUN: Cost 40, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings not scored, Durability 79. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 73, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for BJUN, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBJUNZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC49A73Higher
Tradability15% weightB68HigherB65
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA89
Durability5% weightA79HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BJUN and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and BJUN 37th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 76
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 66
  3. Rank 37CBAUGInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 37CBJUNInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  5. Rank 37CBMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BJUNCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

BJUN A one-year seatbelt on the S&P 500. BJUN absorbs the first 9% of SPY's losses and tracks it upward to a preset cap, then resets each June 1 with a fresh cap and a fresh buffer.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

BJUN The fund seeks to match the return of SPY up to a predetermined cap while protecting investors from the first 9% of losses during the outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • BJUN Terms are defined up front: it aims to absorb the first 9% of an SPY decline over the 12-month outcome period, matching gains up to a cap set at the start.innovatoretfs.com
  • It is a plain 1940 Act ETF built from options on SPY, not a bank-issued note, so no single issuer's credit sits between you and the payoff.innovatoretfs.com
  • Running since June 2019, so the June series has cycled through many annual resets, and it stands in the upper half of a crowded shallow-buffer field.
  • Trades with less friction than much of the dated-buffer group, which matters when you choose your own entry and exit rather than the fund's.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • BJUN The cap is what you hand over for the cushion, and it is struck fresh each June 1. You do not know the new ceiling until the period begins.innovatoretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are measured across the full outcome period. Step in midstream and you get whatever protection and upside are left, not the headline 9%.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.79% a year is the going rate in this group, not the floor: laddered BUFB runs 0.10% and quarterly-reset ZALT 0.69%. This line also pays no regular distributions.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full BJUN profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

BJUN vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BJUN vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying BJUN vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BJUN 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BJUN 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BJUN $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBJUNZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BJUN
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

BJUN 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BJUN vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
BJUN None
ZALT None

Distribution history

BJUNAll BJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BJUN vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BJUN 7.2%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BJUN 1.41ZALT 1.51, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BJUN −16.7%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BJUN 0.56ZALT 0.29

BJUN and ZALT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BJUNCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJUNCvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJUNCvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.