ZALT ranks 1st and BJUN 37th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
BJUN vs ZALT
ZALT −0.10pt a year
0.79%0.69%
ZALT 4.3×the volume
31.2K135K
BJUN +4.0pt
+14.0%+10.0%
BJUN vs ZALT Performance
+7.4%+7.7%
- BJUN 0.79%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- BJUN $239M
- ZALT $835M
- BJUN +7.4%
- ZALT +7.7%, better
- BJUN 3
- ZALT 503
- BJUN 31.2K sh
- ZALT 135K sh, better
- BJUN $48.34
- ZALT $34.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BJUN | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | C49 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | B68Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | A89 | |
| Durability | A79Higher | B61 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. BJUN and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BJUNC
ZALTA
In short
BJUN A one-year seatbelt on the S&P 500. BJUN absorbs the first 9% of SPY's losses and tracks it upward to a preset cap, then resets each June 1 with a fresh cap and a fresh buffer.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
BJUN The fund seeks to match the return of SPY up to a predetermined cap while protecting investors from the first 9% of losses during the outcome period.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BJUN vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BJUN vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying BJUN vs ZALT
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BJUN 0.79%
$15,174
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BJUN | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,232 | $173 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $4,697 | $634 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $13,429 | $1,745 |
- 0.79%BJUN
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
BJUN 34th cheapest of 77 funds
BJUN vs ZALT Dividends
- BJUN None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
BJUN vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BJUN 7.2%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BJUN 1.41ZALT 1.51, better
- Worst fall
- BJUN −16.7%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BJUN 0.56ZALT 0.29
BJUN and ZALT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
