CGXU ranks 1st and BKCI 10th of 14 funds in the International Active Growth Category.
BKCI vs CGXU
CGXU −0.21pt a year
0.75%0.54%
CGXU 204.3×the volume
4.99K1.02M
CGXU +9.2pt
+7.0%+16.2%
BKCI vs CGXU Performance
+6.3%+10.7%
- BKCI 0.75%
- CGXU 0.54%, better
- BKCI $129M
- CGXU $6.21B
- BKCI +6.3%
- CGXU +10.7%, better
- BKCI 1.33%
- CGXU 5.35%, better
- BKCI 32
- CGXU 90
- BKCI 4.99K sh
- CGXU 1.02M sh, better
- BKCI $52.66
- CGXU $30.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKCI | CGXU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F1 | A76Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | A77 | A90Higher |
Rank among International Active Growth funds
Same Category. BKCI and CGXU are both graded against the same 14 International Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKCID
CGXUB
In short
BKCI A concentrated take on developed markets outside the US: sub-adviser Walter Scott runs bottom-up research down to roughly 30 high-conviction stocks, with Canada in the mix alongside the usual Europe-Japan-Australasia names.
CGXU Launched in 2022, CGXU runs international growth on a short leash: roughly 80 developed- and emerging-market stocks picked bottom-up, at a fee below the typical active rival in its lane.
Stated mandate
BKCI The fund seeks long-term total return by investing mainly in equities of developed-market companies outside the United States. Its manager uses bottom-up fundamental research to select reasonably valued companies with sustainable growth prospects.
CGXU The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing primarily in international equities, including companies in developed and emerging markets. It uses active, bottom-up stock selection to pursue companies with attractive growth opportunities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKCI vs CGXU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKCI vs CGXU Cost
Overpaying BKCI vs CGXU
$3,762
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKCI 0.75%
$14,482
CGXU 0.54%
$10,720
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKCI | CGXU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $971 | $365 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,724 | $1,354 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $10,720 | $3,762 |
- 0.75%BKCI
- 0.54%CGXU, cheaper
- Middle half of International Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
CGXU 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
BKCI 14th cheapest of 14 funds
BKCI vs CGXU Dividends
- BKCI 1.33%
- CGXU 5.35%, better
- BKCI $0.72
- CGXU $1.69
- BKCI $0.72
- CGXU $0.41
- BKCI Dec 29, 2025
- CGXU Jun 30, 2026
- BKCI Jan 2, 2026
- CGXU Jul 1, 2026
- BKCI Annual
- CGXU Twice a year
Distribution history
BKCI vs CGXU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKCI 11.9%, betterCGXU 15.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BKCI 0.35CGXU 0.84, better
- Worst fall
- BKCI −31.0%CGXU −25.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BKCI 0.85CGXU 0.97
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.54%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.54%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.