DFAC ranks 3rd and BLUX 25th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
BLUX vs DFAC
DFAC −0.06pt a year
0.23%0.17%
DFAC 40.8×the volume
49.1K2M
BLUX vs DFAC Performance
+14.2%+16.1%
- BLUX 0.23%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- BLUX $629M
- DFAC $87.7B
- BLUX +14.2%
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- BLUX 1.00%, better
- DFAC 0.88%
- BLUX 5
- DFAC 2553
- BLUX 49.1K sh
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- BLUX $32.01
- DFAC $44.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BLUX | DFAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89 | A94Higher |
| Mission | B69 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B62 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B66 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | A87Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A97Higher |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. BLUX and DFAC are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BLUXA
DFACA
In short
BLUX An active fund that buys ETFs, not stocks: Bluemonte dials broad U.S. market exposure across large, mid and small caps, with an international slice, from a short list of building-block funds.
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
Stated mandate
BLUX The Fund seeks capital growth through an actively managed portfolio of ETFs that provides broad market exposure, primarily to U.S. companies across market capitalizations.
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BLUX vs DFAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BLUX vs DFAC Cost
Overpaying BLUX vs DFAC
$1,213
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BLUX 0.23%
$4,759
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BLUX | DFAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $310 | $109 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $1,211 | $419 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $3,546 | $1,213 |
- 0.23%BLUX
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
BLUX 14th cheapest of 121 funds
BLUX vs DFAC Dividends
- BLUX 1.00%, better
- DFAC 0.88%
- BLUX $0.31
- DFAC $0.39
- BLUX $0.09
- DFAC $0.10
- BLUX Sep 28, 2026
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- BLUX Sep 30, 2026
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- BLUX Quarterly
- DFAC Quarterly
Distribution history
BLUX vs DFAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BLUX 11.6%DFAC 12.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BLUX 1.08DFAC 1.32
- Worst fall
- BLUX −9.0%DFAC −23.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BLUX 0.88DFAC 0.99
BLUX and DFAC in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.