Skip to content

BMAY vs ZALT

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BMAYCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

BMAY0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 6.9×the volume

BMAY20.1KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

BMAY +5.8pt

BMAY+16.4%ZALT+10.6%

BMAY vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.4%BMAY+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BMAY +9.4%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BMAY 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
BMAY $180M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
BMAY +9.4%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
BMAY 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
BMAY 20.1K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
BMAY $48.33
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BMAY: Cost 40, Risk 68, Mission not scored, Tradability 52, Holdings not scored, Durability 73. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for BMAY, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBMAYZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightB68A79Higher
Tradability15% weightC52B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA90
Durability5% weightA73HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BMAY and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and BMAY 37th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 37CBJUNInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 37CBMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  5. Rank 40CBNOVInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BMAYCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

BMAY Innovator's May-dated buffer fund: it shadows the S&P 500 up to a preset cap and absorbs the first 9% of losses over a one-year outcome period that resets each May 1. The shallow buffer is what buys the higher cap.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

BMAY The fund seeks to track SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • BMAY The contract is spelled out up front: first 9% of S&P 500 losses absorbed, gains capped, over a defined period ending April 30. You know the shape of the outcome before you own it.
  • 0.79% a year, right at the median for its buffer cohort. Options-built defense costs more than plain index beta, but you aren't paying above the going rate for it.
  • Live since 2020, with several full outcome periods behind it rather than a launch-week track record.
  • Lands in the upper half of a crowded cohort of 50-plus shallow S&P 500 buffer funds.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • BMAY The 9% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever protection and upside are left, not the headline terms.
  • Thinly traded next to the S&P 500 giants, so spreads can be wider and limit orders earn their keep.
  • Innovator's laddered sibling BUFB spreads across start months and carries a 0.10% expense ratio, a cheaper route for anyone who doesn't want a single calendar slot.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full BMAY profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

BMAY vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BMAY vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying BMAY vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BMAY 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BMAY 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BMAY $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBMAYZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BMAY
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

BMAY 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BMAY vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BMAY None
ZALT None

Distribution history

BMAYAll BMAY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BMAY vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BMAY 6.1%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BMAY 1.82, betterZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BMAY −17.7%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BMAY 0.48ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • BMAYCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BMAYCvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BMAYCvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.