BNDW ranks 2nd and BOND 17th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
BNDW vs BOND
BNDW −0.46pt a year
0.05%0.51%
BOND 7.0×the volume
117K819K
BOND +0.1pt
+0.1%+0.2%
BNDW vs BOND Performance
+0.4%+0.8%
- BNDW 0.05%, better
- BOND 0.51%
- BNDW $1.9B
- BOND $8.54B
- BNDW −0.4%
- BOND −0.1%, better
- BNDW 4.36%
- BOND 5.34%, better
- BNDW 4
- BOND 1653
- BNDW 117K sh
- BOND 819K sh, better
- BNDW $66.90
- BOND $88.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BNDW | BOND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D27 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C43Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | B67 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | F20 | D28Higher |
| Durability | A83 | A85Higher |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. BNDW and BOND are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BNDWA
BONDB
In short
BNDW One ticker for the whole investment-grade bond market, home and abroad. Vanguard built BNDW as a wrapper around its own US and international bond funds and prices the package at 0.05% a year.
BOND PIMCO's answer to the index core bond sleeve: an actively run, global fixed income portfolio that treats the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate as a yardstick, not a blueprint. Running since 2012, and you pay up for the manager.
Stated mandate
BNDW The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index and provide broad exposure to the global investment-grade bond market through an ETF-of-ETFs structure.
BOND The Fund seeks current income and long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, diversified portfolio of fixed-income instruments. It may use derivatives and pursue strategic, bottom-up security selection.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BNDW vs BOND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BNDW vs BOND Cost
Overpaying BOND vs BNDW
$9,105
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BNDW 0.05%
$1,060
BOND 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BNDW | BOND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $918 | $826 |
| 20 | $360 | $3,527 | $3,167 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $10,165 | $9,105 |
- 0.05%BNDW, cheaper
- 0.51%BOND
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
BNDW cheapest of 28 funds
BOND 21st cheapest of 28 funds
BNDW vs BOND Dividends
- BNDW 4.36%
- BOND 5.34%, better
- BNDW $2.92
- BOND $4.75
- BNDW $0.20
- BOND $0.40
- BNDW Oct 1, 2026
- BOND Oct 1, 2026
- BNDW Oct 5, 2026
- BOND Oct 5, 2026
- BNDW Monthly
- BOND Monthly
Distribution history
BNDW vs BOND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BNDW
- BOND
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BNDW 4.7%, betterBOND 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BNDW 0.10BOND 0.33, better
- Worst fall
- BNDW −16.2%, betterBOND −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BNDW 0.82BOND 1.09
BNDW and BOND in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
