BNDW ranks 2nd and FBND 6th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
BNDW vs FBND
BNDW −0.31pt a year
0.05%0.36%
FBND 32.7×the volume
117K3.83M
FBND +0.4pt
+0.1%+0.5%
BNDW vs FBND Performance
+0.4%+2.4%
- BNDW 0.05%, better
- FBND 0.36%
- BNDW $1.9B
- FBND $27.9B
- BNDW −0.4%
- FBND −0.2%, better
- BNDW 4.36%
- FBND 4.80%, better
- BNDW 4
- FBND 4840
- BNDW 117K sh
- FBND 3.83M sh, better
- BNDW $66.90
- FBND $44.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BNDW | FBND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B64 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C43Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | B67 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | F20 | B64Higher |
| Durability | A83 | A89Higher |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. BNDW and FBND are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BNDWA
FBNDA
In short
BNDW One ticker for the whole investment-grade bond market, home and abroad. Vanguard built BNDW as a wrapper around its own US and international bond funds and prices the package at 0.05% a year.
FBND An active core bond fund in an ETF wrapper: Fidelity treats the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate as a benchmark, not a cage, adding high-yield and emerging-market debt to the investment-grade base. Pays monthly.
Stated mandate
BNDW The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index and provide broad exposure to the global investment-grade bond market through an ETF-of-ETFs structure.
FBND The fund seeks a high level of current income. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in debt securities and repurchase agreements, diversifying across investment-grade, high-yield, and emerging-market debt.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BNDW vs FBND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BNDW vs FBND Cost
Overpaying FBND vs BNDW
$6,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BNDW 0.05%
$1,060
FBND 0.36%
$7,320
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BNDW | FBND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $652 | $560 |
| 20 | $360 | $2,522 | $2,162 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $7,320 | $6,260 |
- 0.05%BNDW, cheaper
- 0.36%FBND
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
BNDW cheapest of 28 funds
FBND 11th cheapest of 28 funds
BNDW vs FBND Dividends
- BNDW 4.36%
- FBND 4.80%, better
- BNDW $2.92
- FBND $2.12
- BNDW $0.20
- FBND $0.18
- BNDW Oct 1, 2026
- FBND Oct 29, 2026
- BNDW Oct 5, 2026
- FBND Pays Nov 2, 2026
- BNDW Monthly
- FBND Monthly
Distribution history
BNDW vs FBND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BNDW
- FBND
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BNDW 4.7%, betterFBND 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BNDW 0.10FBND 0.26, better
- Worst fall
- BNDW −16.2%, betterFBND −16.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BNDW 0.82FBND 0.99
BNDW and FBND in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
