Skip to content

BNOV vs ZALT

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BNOVCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

BNOV0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 7.7×the volume

BNOV17.6KZALT135K

3Y return · a year

BNOV +3.9pt

BNOV+13.9%ZALT+10.0%

BNOV vs ZALT Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+11.1%BNOV+7.7%ZALT

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. BNOV +11.1%. ZALT +7.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BNOV 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
BNOV $195M
ZALT $835M
1Y total return
BNOV +11.1%, better
ZALT +7.7%
Holdings
BNOV 503
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
BNOV 17.6K sh
ZALT 135K sh, better
NAV per share
BNOV $47.65
ZALT $34.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BNOV: Cost 40, Risk 34, Mission 84, Tradability 54, Holdings 89, Durability 76. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 73, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for BNOV, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBNOVZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightA84HigherA80
Risk15% weightD34A73Higher
Tradability15% weightC54B65Higher
Holdings10% weightA89A89
Durability5% weightA76HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BNOV and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and BNOV 40th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 76
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 66
  3. Rank 37CBMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 40CBNOVInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 50
  5. Rank 41CFFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BNOVCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

BNOV The November rung of Innovator's buffer lineup: it follows the big S&P 500 ETF up to a cap set each November 1 and absorbs that ETF's first 9% of losses, then starts over a year later.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

BNOV The fund seeks to track SPY up to a predetermined cap while buffering investors against the first 9% of losses over the outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • BNOV The contract is simple: the first 9% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's decline is buffered over the outcome period, with gains capped at a level fixed at the start.
  • Running since its 2019 launch, it resets on a fixed calendar: a fresh buffer and cap every November 1, through the following October 31.
  • The 0.79% expense ratio sits right at the median for shallow-buffer funds built on the same S&P 500 ETF.
  • The defined outcome arrives in a plain 1940 Act ETF wrapper, not a bank-issued structured note.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • BNOV Priced with the pack at 0.79%, but cheaper paths to a buffer exist, including the laddered BUFB at 0.10%.
  • The buffer and cap are engineered for a full outcome period. Buying mid-period means your effective protection and upside differ from the headline terms.
  • It trades thinly next to its peers, and across a crowded field of 50-plus shallow-buffer funds it sits in the lower half on cost, trading and risk.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full BNOV profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

BNOV vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BNOV vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying BNOV vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BNOV 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BNOV 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BNOV $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBNOVZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BNOV
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

BNOV 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BNOV vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
BNOV None
ZALT None

Distribution history

BNOVAll BNOV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BNOV vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BNOV 8.0%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BNOV 1.23ZALT 1.51, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BNOV −16.3%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BNOV 0.71ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • BNOVCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BNOVCvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BNOVCvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.