Skip to content

BOTT vs IQM

Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF

BOTTBNasdaq

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF

IQMBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BOTT −0.15pt a year

BOTT0.35%IQM0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

BOTT 3.0×the volume

BOTT18.6KIQM6.2K

BOTT vs IQM Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−16.6%BOTT−4.9%IQM

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. BOTT −16.6%. IQM −4.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BOTT 0.35%, better
IQM 0.50%
Fund size
BOTT $57M
IQM $75M
1Y total return
BOTT −16.6%
IQM −4.9%, better
Yield (12M)
BOTT 0.16%, better
IQM 0.00%
Holdings
BOTT 39
IQM 70
Avg volume (30D)
BOTT 18.6K sh, better
IQM 6.2K sh
NAV per share
BOTT $35.49
IQM $93.25
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BOTT: Cost 97, Risk 17, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 60, Durability 37. IQM: Cost 65, Risk 37, Mission 50, Tradability 64, Holdings 60, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for BOTT, IQM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBOTTIQM
Cost30% weightA97HigherB65
Mission25% weightNot scoredC50
Risk15% weightF17D37Higher
Tradability15% weightC45B64Higher
Holdings10% weightB60B60
Durability5% weightD37A70Higher

Rank among Robotics & Automation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BOTT and IQM are both graded against the same 18 Robotics & Automation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Robotics & Automation⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

BOTT ranks 4th and IQM 6th of 18 funds in the Robotics & Automation Category.

  1. Rank 1AIBOTVanEck Robotics ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2BFBOTFidelity Disruptive Automation ETFScore 67
  3. Rank 3BWDRNWisdomTree Physical AI, Humanoids, and Drones FundScore 62
  4. Rank 4BBOTTThemes Humanoid Robotics ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 4BFDIFFidelity Disruptors ETFScore 61
  6. Rank 6BBULDPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETFScore 58
  7. Rank 6BIQMFranklin Intelligent Machines ETFScore 58
  8. Rank 8CBOTZGlobal X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BOTTBThemes Humanoid Robotics ETF

IQMBFranklin Intelligent Machines ETF

In short

BOTT Most robotics funds buy the whole factory floor. BOTT buys the androids: about 30 global names across the humanoid and service robot value chain, at 0.35% a year.

IQM Franklin's take on robotics goes wider than robots: it hunts the whole intelligent-machine stack, from design and manufacturing to logistics and predictive maintenance, in a compact portfolio priced under the category norm.

Stated mandate

BOTT The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies deriving significant revenue from designing and developing humanoid and service robots.

IQM The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities of companies associated with intelligent machines, including innovations in design, manufacturing, logistics, products, and predictive maintenance.

Why people hold it

  • BOTT At 0.35% it undercuts the typical robotics and automation ETF (median 0.65%) and every peer ranked above it: IBOT at 0.47%, FBOT and FDIF at 0.50%.
  • A true pure play. Its index, the Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index, targets companies building humanoid and service robots, not the broad factory automation basket.themesetfs.com
  • Global mandate, about 30 names. Tight enough that the humanoid theme actually shows up in the portfolio instead of getting buried under mega-cap ballast.themesetfs.com
  • Sits in the upper half of its robotics and automation peer group, one of the stronger builds of a very young theme.
  • IQM Charges 0.50% a year, under the 0.65% median for robotics and automation funds.
  • The mandate covers design, manufacturing, logistics, products and predictive maintenance, so the sleeve reaches past pure robot builders into the software and services around them.
  • Roughly 60 stocks. Tight enough that the theme actually drives returns instead of getting diluted into a broad tech basket.
  • Trading since 2020 and sitting in the upper half of its robotics and automation peer group, with no structural red flags on the wrapper.

Worth knowing

  • BOTT Lightly traded next to the category's giants, so spreads can be wider and bigger orders need more care at the point of trade.
  • Short file: the fund launched in 2024 and Themes relaunched it with the humanoid focus in 2025, so there is little live history to judge.globenewswire.com
  • About 30 stocks in one early-stage theme is concentrated, swingy exposure, and cash comes back to you once or twice a year at most.
  • IQM Volume is light for the category. Spreads and order type matter more here than in the cohort's heavyweights.
  • The stated goal is capital appreciation, so income is not part of the design.
  • Cheaper shelf-mates exist: BOTT runs 0.35% and IBOT 0.47%, both chasing overlapping robotics ground.

Full BOTT profile⁠

Full IQM profile⁠

BOTT vs IQM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BOTT vs IQM Cost

Overpaying IQM vs BOTT

$2,853

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BOTT 0.35%

    $7,126

  • IQM 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BOTT 0.35%
  • IQM 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530IQM $9,979BOTT $7,126

Year by year

YearBOTTIQMOverpaying
10$634$900$266
20$2,454$3,460$1,006
30$7,126$9,979$2,853

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%BOTT, cheaper
  • 0.50%IQM
  • Middle half of Robotics & Automation funds
  • Median 0.54%

BOTT cheapest of 18 funds

IQM 7th cheapest of 18 funds

BOTT vs IQM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
BOTT 0.16%, better
IQM 0.00%
Payout (12M)
BOTT $0.06
IQM None
Last payment
BOTT $0.06
IQM No data
Ex-dividend
BOTT Dec 18, 2025
IQM No data
Paid on
BOTT Dec 19, 2025
IQM No data
Frequency
BOTT Irregular
IQM No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

BOTTIrregular · 2 paymentsAll BOTT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2024 $0.48; Dec 18, 2025 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
IQM2 paymentsAll IQM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 14, 2020 $0.0043; Dec 13, 2021 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

BOTT vs IQM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BOTT 36.2%since May 2024IQM 28.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BOTT 0.43since May 2024IQM 0.94
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BOTT −44.3%since Apr 2024IQM −44.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BOTT 1.60IQM 1.65

BOTT and IQM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BOTTBvsIBOTA

    Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF · VanEck Robotics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IQMBvsIBOTA

    Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF · VanEck Robotics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BOTTBvsFBOTB

    Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF · Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IQMBvsFBOTB

    Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF · Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BOTTBvsWDRNB

    Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF · WisdomTree Physical AI, Humanoids, and Drones Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IQMBvsWDRNB

    Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF · WisdomTree Physical AI, Humanoids, and Drones Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.