BOTT ranks 4th and IQM 6th of 18 funds in the Robotics & Automation Category.
BOTT vs IQM
BOTT −0.15pt a year
0.35%0.50%
BOTT 3.0×the volume
18.6K6.2K
BOTT vs IQM Performance
−16.6%−4.9%
- BOTT 0.35%, better
- IQM 0.50%
- BOTT $57M
- IQM $75M
- BOTT −16.6%
- IQM −4.9%, better
- BOTT 0.16%, better
- IQM 0.00%
- BOTT 39
- IQM 70
- BOTT 18.6K sh, better
- IQM 6.2K sh
- BOTT $35.49
- IQM $93.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BOTT | IQM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B65 |
| Mission | C50 | |
| Risk | F17 | D37Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | B60 |
| Durability | D37 | A70Higher |
Rank among Robotics & Automation funds
Same Category. BOTT and IQM are both graded against the same 18 Robotics & Automation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BOTTB
IQMB
In short
BOTT Most robotics funds buy the whole factory floor. BOTT buys the androids: about 30 global names across the humanoid and service robot value chain, at 0.35% a year.
IQM Franklin's take on robotics goes wider than robots: it hunts the whole intelligent-machine stack, from design and manufacturing to logistics and predictive maintenance, in a compact portfolio priced under the category norm.
Stated mandate
BOTT The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies deriving significant revenue from designing and developing humanoid and service robots.
IQM The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities of companies associated with intelligent machines, including innovations in design, manufacturing, logistics, products, and predictive maintenance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BOTT vs IQM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BOTT vs IQM Cost
Overpaying IQM vs BOTT
$2,853
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BOTT 0.35%
$7,126
IQM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BOTT | IQM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $900 | $266 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $3,460 | $1,006 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $9,979 | $2,853 |
- 0.35%BOTT, cheaper
- 0.50%IQM
- Middle half of Robotics & Automation funds
- Median 0.54%
BOTT cheapest of 18 funds
IQM 7th cheapest of 18 funds
BOTT vs IQM Dividends
- BOTT 0.16%, better
- IQM 0.00%
- BOTT $0.06
- IQM None
- BOTT $0.06
- IQM
- BOTT Dec 18, 2025
- IQM
- BOTT Dec 19, 2025
- IQM
- BOTT Irregular
- IQM
Distribution history
BOTT vs IQM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BOTT 36.2%IQM 28.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BOTT 0.43IQM 0.94
- Worst fall
- BOTT −44.3%IQM −44.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BOTT 1.60IQM 1.65
BOTT and IQM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

