Skip to content

BSEP vs ZALT

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BSEPBCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

98.2%by weight

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

BSEP0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 2.5×the volume

BSEP56.1KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

BSEP +6.9pt

BSEP+17.5%ZALT+10.6%

BSEP vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.2%BSEP+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BSEP +10.2%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BSEP 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
BSEP $459M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
BSEP +10.2%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Yield (12M)
BSEP 0.00%
ZALT No data
Holdings
BSEP 503
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
BSEP 56.1K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
BSEP $53.71
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BSEP: Cost 40, Risk 40, Mission 97, Tradability 66, Holdings 90, Durability 76. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for BSEP, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBSEPZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightA97HigherA80
Risk15% weightC40A79Higher
Tradability15% weightB66HigherB65
Holdings10% weightA90A90
Durability5% weightA76HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BSEP and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and BSEP 30th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 30CBFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  4. Rank 30BBSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 54
  5. Rank 32CAUGTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BSEPBInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

BSEP Innovator's September-reset buffer fund: it tracks SPY, absorbs the first 9% of a decline, and trades that cushion for a cap reset every fall. Downside padding with a ceiling, on a schedule you can mark on a calendar.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

BSEP The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a predetermined cap, while protecting investors against the first 9% of losses during the outcome period. It resets approximately annually.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • BSEP Absorbs the first 9% of an SPY decline over each roughly one-year outcome period, a cushion written into the fund's documents rather than left to a manager's call.
  • The terms are mechanical and public: SPY as the reference, a 9% buffer, a cap set at each September reset, the period running through the end of August.
  • The 0.79% fee lands right at the median for buffer funds, so the defined-outcome wrapper isn't costing a premium versus the pack.
  • Running since 2019, with years of completed reset cycles behind it across both rising and falling markets.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • BSEP Cheaper buffered exposure exists. Innovator's own laddered BUFB charges 0.10% and spreads money across staggered outcome periods instead of one annual window.
  • Trading is thin next to the category's larger funds, so spreads can widen. Limit orders are the usual defense.
  • No distributions: the payoff is built around price movement inside the cap and buffer. Buying mid-period also means a different cap and remaining cushion than a fresh start.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full BSEP profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

BSEP vs ZALT Holdings

How BSEP and ZALT differ

Overlap by weight

98.2%

Shared holdings make up 98.9% of ZALT and 98.3% of BSEP.

Level by level

  • Holdings501 in both98.2%
  • Sector11 Sectors98.9%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in BSEP and ZALT, widest gap first
SectorMore in BSEPMore in ZALT
TechnologyBSEP +0.8 points
CommunicationZALT +0.3 points
MaterialsBSEP +0.3 points
FinancialsZALT +0.3 points
Health CareZALT +0.2 points
EnergySame weight
Consumer StaplesZALT +0.1 points
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BSEP and ZALT, widest gap first
CountryMore in BSEPMore in ZALT
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BSEP40.2%
  • ZALT37.7%

Securities held

  • BSEP503
  • ZALT503

Asset class

BSEP
Equity
ZALT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BSEP2
  • In both501
  • Only in ZALT2

Only in BSEP

2 securities, 5.5% of BSEP by weight

  • Spy 08/31/2027 767.06 P5.36%
  • Spy 08/31/2027 797.75 C0.09%

Only in ZALT

2 securities, 2.7% of ZALT by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 762.61 P2.67%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 770.26 C<0.01%

Weight gaps

The 100 widest of 501 Holdings in both funds.

Holding weights in BSEP and ZALT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BSEPMore in ZALT
Apple IncAAPLZALT +0.06 points
NVIDIA CorpNVDAZALT +0.05 points
Microsoft CorpMSFTZALT +0.04 points
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037BSEP +0.04 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNZALT +0.03 points
Alphabet IncGOOGLZALT +0.02 points
Broadcom IncAVGOZALT +0.02 points
Meta Platforms IncMETAZALT +0.02 points

All BSEP holdings⁠All ZALT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BSEP vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying BSEP vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BSEP 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BSEP 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BSEP $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearBSEPZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BSEP
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

BSEP 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BSEP vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BSEP 0.00%
ZALT No data
Payout (12M)
BSEP None
ZALT None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

BSEP1 paymentAll BSEP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252019
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BSEP vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BSEP 8.1%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BSEP 1.50ZALT 1.50Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BSEP −15.0%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BSEP 0.65ZALT 0.29

BSEP and ZALT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BSEPBvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSEPBvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSEPBvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.