DFAC ranks 3rd and BSR 112th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
BSR vs DFAC
DFAC −1.31pt a year
1.48%0.17%
DFAC 1466.1×the volume
1.37K2M
DFAC +12.6pt
+8.5%+21.1%
BSR vs DFAC Performance
+3.8%+15.9%
- BSR 1.48%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- BSR $33M
- DFAC $87.6B
- BSR +3.8%
- DFAC +15.9%, better
- BSR 2.82%, better
- DFAC 0.88%
- BSR 31
- DFAC 2550
- BSR 1.37K sh
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- BSR $30.22
- DFAC $44.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSR | DFAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A94Higher |
| Mission | B57 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C51 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | F15 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | A87Higher |
| Durability | C45 | A97Higher |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. BSR and DFAC are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSRF
DFACA
In short
BSR A fund of funds that owns ETFs, not stocks, and runs four separate risk switches: each sleeve can move to bonds on its own signals. Active defense, priced at 1.48% a year with no waiver.
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
Stated mandate
BSR The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed fund-of-funds structure investing in Vanguard sector ETFs.
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSR vs DFAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSR vs DFAC Cost
Overpaying BSR vs DFAC
$22,453
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSR 1.48%
$25,999
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSR | DFAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,558 | $310 | $2,248 |
| 20 | $9,408 | $1,211 | $8,197 |
| 30 | $25,999 | $3,546 | $22,453 |
- 1.48%BSR
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
BSR 114th cheapest of 121 funds
BSR vs DFAC Dividends
- BSR 2.82%, better
- DFAC 0.88%
- BSR $0.85
- DFAC $0.39
- BSR $0.85
- DFAC $0.10
- BSR Dec 26, 2025
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- BSR Jan 2, 2026
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- BSR Annual
- DFAC Quarterly
Distribution history
BSR vs DFAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSR 9.3%, betterDFAC 12.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSR 0.51DFAC 1.32, better
- Worst fall
- BSR −15.7%DFAC −23.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BSR 0.87DFAC 0.99
BSR and DFAC in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 1.48% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.