BTCC ranks 2nd and XRPM 9th of 21 funds in the Crypto Option Income Category.
BTCC vs XRPM
1.0%by weight
BTCC −0.09pt a year
0.66%0.75%
BTCC 1.2×the volume
23.9K20.6K
BTCC vs XRPM Performance
−15.3%−52.6%
- BTCC 0.66%, better
- XRPM 0.75%
- BTCC $15M
- XRPM $11M
- BTCC −27.4%
- XRPM
- BTCC 65.93%
- XRPM
- BTCC 4
- XRPM 9
- BTCC 23.9K sh, better
- XRPM 20.6K sh
- BTCC $12.40
- XRPM $7.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTCC | XRPM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | B67 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | C44Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | C51Higher | D35 |
Rank among Crypto Option Income funds
Same Category. BTCC and XRPM are both graded against the same 21 Crypto Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTCCB
XRPMC
In short
BTCC Grayscale's income angle on bitcoin: rather than just holding the asset, BTCC sells calls against bitcoin ETPs to convert crypto volatility into cash. Income first, bitcoin participation second, at a fee that undercuts most of its covered-call peers.
Stated mandate
BTCC The Fund seeks current income and, secondarily, participation in Bitcoin returns through options on Bitcoin exchange-traded products designed to track Bitcoin's price.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTCC vs XRPM Holdings
How BTCC and XRPM differ
1.0%
Shared holdings make up 1.9% of XRPM and 1.0% of BTCC.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings1.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BTCC and XRPM.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BTCCMore in XRPM | BTCC | XRPM |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- BTCC108.4%
- XRPM106.0%
- BTCC3
- XRPM8
Asset class
- BTCC
- Alternatives
- XRPM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BTCC3
- In both0
- Only in XRPM8
Only in BTCC
3 securities, 100% of BTCC by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 12/24/202693.90%
- Gbtc 03/19/2027 56.54 C13.41%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.09%
Only in XRPM
8 securities, 100% of XRPM by weight
- Canary XRP ETF29.50%
- Xrpc 12/18/2026 11.25 C22.12%
- Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12/31/203120.12%
- United States Treasury Bill 11/05/20269.39%
- United States Treasury Bill 11/24/20269.37%
- United States Treasury Bill 11/19/20267.03%
- United States Treasury Bill 11/03/20264.69%
- United States Treasury Bill 12/22/20261.87%
Weight gaps
BTCC and XRPM share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTCC vs XRPM Cost
Overpaying XRPM vs BTCC
$1,586
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTCC 0.66%
$12,896
XRPM 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTCC | XRPM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $1,336 | $156 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $5,078 | $574 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $14,482 | $1,586 |
- 0.66%BTCC, cheaper
- 0.75%XRPM
- Middle half of Crypto Option Income funds
- Median 0.85%
BTCC 5th cheapest of 21 funds
XRPM 6th cheapest of 21 funds
BTCC vs XRPM Dividends
- BTCC 65.93%
- XRPM
- BTCC $8.16
- XRPM
- BTCC $0.22
- XRPM $0.25
- BTCC Oct 29, 2026
- XRPM Oct 29, 2026
- BTCC Oct 30, 2026
- XRPM Oct 30, 2026
- BTCC Irregular
- XRPM Monthly
Distribution history
BTCC vs XRPM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTCC 29.0%XRPM
- Return per unit of risk
- BTCC −0.65XRPM
- Worst fall
- BTCC −44.3%XRPM
- Market sensitivity
- BTCC 1.01XRPM 0.80
BTCC and XRPM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
