MSBT ranks 2nd and BTCO 9th of 12 funds in the Spot Bitcoin Category.
BTCO vs MSBT
0.0%by weight
MSBT −0.11pt a year
0.25%0.14%
MSBT 7.7×the volume
80.3K615K
BTCO vs MSBT Performance
+21.8%+22.0%
- BTCO 0.25%
- MSBT 0.14%, better
- BTCO $384M
- MSBT $830M
- BTCO −30.3%
- MSBT
- BTCO 1
- MSBT 1
- BTCO 80.3K sh
- MSBT 615K sh, better
- BTCO $76.27
- MSBT $21.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTCO | MSBT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C46 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | B58Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | C53Higher | D37 |
Rank among Spot Bitcoin funds
Same Category. BTCO and MSBT are both graded against the same 12 Spot Bitcoin funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTCOB
MSBTA
In short
BTCO A day-one member of the January 2024 spot bitcoin class: a trust that holds the coin, tracks the Lukka Prime reference rate, and charges the category's median fee. No yield, no hedging, no cleverness.
MSBT Morgan Stanley's own spot bitcoin vehicle, arriving late to a crowded field and competing on price: 0.14% a year, well under the category median. Plain plumbing, bitcoin held outright, no leverage and no derivatives.
Stated mandate
BTCO The Trust seeks to track the spot price of bitcoin, measured by the Lukka Prime Bitcoin Reference Rate, after expenses and liabilities.
MSBT The Trust is a passive ETF designed to track bitcoin’s performance, as measured by its Pricing Benchmark, after expenses and liabilities. It will hold bitcoin and does not use leverage or derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTCO vs MSBT Holdings
How BTCO and MSBT differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BTCO and 0.0% of MSBT.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BTCO and MSBT.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for BTCO.
Concentration
- BTCO100.0%
- MSBT100.0%
- BTCO1
- MSBT1
Asset class
- BTCO
- Alternatives
- MSBT
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in BTCO1
- In both0
- Only in MSBT1
Only in BTCO
1 security, 100% of BTCO by weight
- Physical Bitcoin100.00%
Only in MSBT
1 security, 100% of MSBT by weight
- Bitcoin100.00%
Weight gaps
BTCO and MSBT share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTCO vs MSBT Cost
Overpaying BTCO vs MSBT
$2,227
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTCO 0.25%
$5,159
MSBT 0.14%
$2,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTCO | MSBT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $256 | $199 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $1,000 | $769 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $2,932 | $2,227 |
- 0.25%BTCO
- 0.14%MSBT, cheaper
- Middle half of Spot Bitcoin funds
- Median 0.23%
MSBT cheapest of 12 funds
BTCO 7th cheapest of 12 funds
BTCO vs MSBT Dividends
- BTCO None
- MSBT None
Distribution history
BTCO vs MSBT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTCO 53.5%MSBT
- Return per unit of risk
- BTCO 0.56MSBT
- Worst fall
- BTCO −53.3%MSBT
- Market sensitivity
- BTCO 2.14MSBT 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.