PSQ ranks 1st and BTCZ 26th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
BTCZ vs PSQ
0.0%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
BTCZ 1.4×the volume
18.5M13M
BTCZ vs PSQ Performance
+16.6%−5.7%
- BTCZ 0.95%
- PSQ 0.95%
- BTCZ $12M
- PSQ $611M
- BTCZ +16.6%, better
- PSQ −5.7%
- BTCZ 0.03%
- PSQ 3.85%, better
- BTCZ 2
- PSQ 4
- BTCZ 18.5M sh, better
- PSQ 13M sh
- BTCZ $3.44
- PSQ $26.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTCZ | PSQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | D36 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A98Higher |
| Holdings | B55 | |
| Durability | D30 | A72Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. BTCZ and PSQ are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTCZC
PSQB
In short
PSQ The plain short on the Nasdaq-100: PSQ aims for -1x the index's daily move, with no leverage multiplier bolted on. It has been running since 2006, making it one of the original one-for-one bear tools.
Stated mandate
PSQ The fund is designed to provide -1x exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index's daily price movement, seeking to benefit when that index declines.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTCZ vs PSQ Holdings
How BTCZ and PSQ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BTCZ and 0.0% of PSQ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BTCZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for BTCZ.
Concentration
- BTCZ300.0%
- PSQ115.2%
- BTCZ1
- PSQ4
Asset class
- BTCZ
- Equity
- PSQ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BTCZ1
- In both0
- Only in PSQ4
Only in BTCZ
1 security, 8.2% of BTCZ by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.18%
Only in PSQ
4 securities, 100% of PSQ by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf74.06%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-1017.97%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-2917.93%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-175.25%
Weight gaps
BTCZ and PSQ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTCZ vs PSQ Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTCZ 0.95%
$17,869
PSQ 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTCZ | PSQ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%BTCZ
- 0.95%PSQ
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
BTCZ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
PSQ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
BTCZ vs PSQ Dividends
- BTCZ 0.03%
- PSQ 3.85%, better
- BTCZ $0.001
- PSQ $1.04
- BTCZ $0.001
- PSQ $0.26
- BTCZ Dec 24, 2025
- PSQ Sep 23, 2026
- BTCZ
- PSQ Sep 29, 2026
- BTCZ Annual
- PSQ Quarterly
Distribution history
BTCZ vs PSQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTCZ 85.5%PSQ 16.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BTCZ −0.47PSQ −1.33
- Worst fall
- BTCZ −91.1%PSQ −61.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BTCZ −1.36PSQ −1.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.