OKTG ranks 3rd and BTDL 301st of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BTDL vs OKTG
0.0%by weight
OKTG −0.75pt a year
1.50%0.75%
BTDL 1.1×the volume
42K38.5K
BTDL vs OKTG Performance
−75.8%+39.8%
- BTDL 1.50%
- OKTG 0.75%, better
- BTDL $2M
- OKTG $8M
- BTDL 2
- OKTG 6
- BTDL 42K sh, better
- OKTG 38.5K sh
- BTDL $4.82
- OKTG $53.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTDL | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | F24 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C40 | C51Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BTDL and OKTG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTDLF
OKTGA
In short
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTDL vs OKTG Holdings
How BTDL and OKTG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BTDL and 0.0% of OKTG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Country0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BTDL and OKTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BTDLMore in OKTG | BTDL | OKTG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singapore | BTDL +100.0 points | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| United States | OKTG +100.0 points | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Outside the US: BTDL 100% developed, 0% emerging.
Concentration
- BTDL100.0%
- OKTG207.4%
- BTDL1
- OKTG1
Asset class
- BTDL
- Leveraged/Inverse
- OKTG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BTDL1
- In both0
- Only in OKTG1
Only in BTDL
1 security, 66.7% of BTDL by weight
- Btdr66.66%
Only in OKTG
1 security, 7.4% of OKTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20407.35%
Weight gaps
BTDL and OKTG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTDL vs OKTG Cost
Overpaying BTDL vs OKTG
$11,801
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTDL 1.50%
$26,283
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTDL | OKTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,336 | $1,254 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $5,078 | $4,441 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $14,482 | $11,801 |
- 1.50%BTDL
- 0.75%OKTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
OKTG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
BTDL 271st cheapest of 315 funds
BTDL vs OKTG Dividends
- BTDL None
- OKTG None
Distribution history
BTDL vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- BTDL 0.00OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.