IUSB ranks 2nd and BTOT 40th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
BTOT vs IUSB
IUSB −0.04pt a year
0.10%0.06%
IUSB 5543.6×the volume
1.11K6.13M
BTOT vs IUSB Performance
−0.7%−0.4%
- BTOT 0.10%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- BTOT $29M
- IUSB $50.2B
- BTOT
- IUSB 0.0%
- BTOT
- IUSB 4.32%
- BTOT 1089
- IUSB 18280
- BTOT 1.11K sh
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- BTOT $48.24
- IUSB $44.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTOT | IUSB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | F8 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A76Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. BTOT and IUSB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTOTB
IUSBA
In short
BTOT One ticket for the US dollar bond market, investment grade and high yield together, at 0.10% a year. iShares launched it in December 2025 as a wider take on core bond exposure than the usual index.
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
Stated mandate
BTOT The Fund seeks broad exposure to U.S.-dollar-denominated fixed-income securities spanning investment-grade and high-yield markets, while tracking its underlying index before fees and expenses.
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTOT vs IUSB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTOT vs IUSB Cost
Overpaying BTOT vs IUSB
$836
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTOT 0.10%
$2,106
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTOT | IUSB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $110 | $73 |
| 20 | $717 | $432 | $285 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $1,270 | $836 |
- 0.10%BTOT
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
BTOT 18th cheapest of 114 funds
BTOT vs IUSB Dividends
- BTOT
- IUSB 4.32%
- BTOT
- IUSB $1.94
- BTOT $0.18
- IUSB $0.15
- BTOT Oct 1, 2026
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- BTOT Oct 6, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- BTOT Monthly
- IUSB Monthly
Distribution history
BTOT vs IUSB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTOT IUSB 5.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BTOT IUSB 0.25
- Worst fall
- BTOT IUSB −17.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BTOT 0.07IUSB 0.96
BTOT and IUSB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
