BUCK ranks 3rd and LTTI 11th of 13 funds in the Treasury Option Income Category.
BUCK vs LTTI
BUCK −0.27pt a year
0.38%0.65%
BUCK 37.1×the volume
196K5.29K
BUCK vs LTTI Performance
+3.4%−5.3%
- BUCK 0.38%, better
- LTTI 0.65%
- BUCK $516M
- LTTI $14M
- BUCK +3.4%, better
- LTTI −5.3%
- BUCK 6.91%
- LTTI 9.55%, better
- BUCK 4
- LTTI 5
- BUCK 196K sh, better
- LTTI 5.29K sh
- BUCK $23.01
- LTTI $17.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUCK | LTTI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B57Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | C53Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A79Higher | B55 |
Rank among Treasury Option Income funds
Same Category. BUCK and LTTI are both graded against the same 13 Treasury Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUCKA
LTTID
In short
BUCK Most Treasury option-income funds write calls on 20+ year bonds and hand you the duration ride. BUCK works the short end: U.S. government securities kept to a year or less of duration, with an option overlay on top, paying monthly.
LTTI Most long-bond option-income funds advertise a headline yield. LTTI aims at a moving one: roughly 5 percentage points above the yield of the 20+ year Treasury ETF it writes options on, funded by Treasuries plus a call spread.
Stated mandate
BUCK The fund seeks monthly income through an actively managed portfolio with at least 80% of net assets in U.S. government securities. It seeks total returns while keeping duration at one year or less and uses risk-managed option writing to add income and total return.
LTTI The Fund seeks current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation. It combines U.S. Treasury investments with purchased and written call options on an underlying ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUCK vs LTTI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUCK vs LTTI Cost
Overpaying LTTI vs BUCK
$5,011
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUCK 0.38%
$7,706
LTTI 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUCK | LTTI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $1,163 | $475 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $4,440 | $1,782 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $12,717 | $5,011 |
- 0.38%BUCK, cheaper
- 0.65%LTTI
- Middle half of Treasury Option Income funds
- Median 0.65%
BUCK 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
LTTI 7th cheapest of 13 funds
BUCK vs LTTI Dividends
- BUCK 6.91%
- LTTI 9.55%, better
- BUCK $1.59
- LTTI $1.65
- BUCK $0.12
- LTTI $0.13
- BUCK Oct 27, 2026
- LTTI Oct 1, 2026
- BUCK Oct 30, 2026
- LTTI Oct 2, 2026
- BUCK Monthly
- LTTI Monthly
Distribution history
BUCK vs LTTI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUCK 3.0%LTTI 9.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUCK 0.08LTTI −0.67
- Worst fall
- BUCK −5.4%LTTI −11.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BUCK 0.08LTTI 0.10
BUCK and LTTI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
