BUFI vs IJUL: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

AB International Buffer ETF

BUFIBNasdaq

Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

IJULBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

BUFI −0.16pt a year

BUFI0.69%IJUL0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

IJUL 3.8×the volume

BUFI11.8KIJUL44.8K

BUFI vs IJUL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.5%BUFI+9.7%IJUL

Expense ratio: BUFI 0.69%, better; IJUL 0.85%
Fund size: BUFI $138M; IJUL $256M
1Y total return: BUFI +6.5%; IJUL +9.7%, better
Yield (12M): BUFI No data; IJUL 0.00%
Holdings: BUFI 4; IJUL 3
Avg volume (30D): BUFI 11.8K sh; IJUL 44.8K sh, better
NAV per share: BUFI $41.81; IJUL $35.98
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for BUFI, IJUL, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	BUFI	IJUL
Cost30% weight	A84Higher	D38
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	C42	C52Higher
Tradability15% weight	C54	A82Higher
Holdings10% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Durability5% weight	C54	A91Higher

Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. BUFI and IJUL are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Developed International Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 26 funds

See all 26 ›

BUFI ranks 1st and IJUL 4th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.

Rank 1BBUFIAB International Buffer ETFScore 65
Rank 2BQBIFAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETFScore 63
Rank 3BIAUGInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 58
Rank 4BIJULInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 55
Rank 4BIOCTInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFIBAB International Buffer ETF

IJULBInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

In short

BUFI No data

IJUL Most buffer ETFs babysit the S&P 500. IJUL points the same 15% downside cushion at developed markets outside the US, tracking an EAFE index fund up to a cap over a one-year outcome period that restarts each July.

Stated mandate

BUFI No data

IJUL The fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

Why people hold it

BUFI No data

IJUL The mechanics are fixed by prospectus: absorb the first 15% of the reference ETF's losses over the outcome period, participate in gains up to a cap set when that period begins.innovatoretfs.com
Foreign exposure, not another S&P 500 clone. The reference asset is the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, so the buffer sits on developed-market equity.innovatoretfs.com
At 0.85% a year, it charges exactly the median fee of its buffer peer group. No surcharge for pointing the structure overseas.
Running since 2019 and one of the strongest implementations in its cohort, with sibling months (IMAR, IAPR, IMAY) available if you want staggered start dates.

Worth knowing

BUFI No data

IJUL The cap is the price of the cushion: upside stops there for the period. Buying mid-period means your own buffer and cap differ from the stated terms.
Return comes from share price, not income. The options-based structure has produced no distributions, so EAFE's dividend stream is not passed through.
Volume is light next to plain index funds, so spreads and limit orders matter more at the moment you trade.

Full BUFI profile⁠

Full IJUL profile⁠

BUFI vs IJUL Holdings

How BUFI and IJUL differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BUFI and 0.0% of IJUL.

Level by level

Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
Holdings0 in both0.0%
Countryby domicile100%
Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in BUFI and IJUL, widest gap first
Sector	More in BUFIMore in IJUL	BUFI	IJUL
Financials	Same weight	26.1%	26.1%
Industrials	Same weight	18.7%	18.7%
Technology	Same weight	12.0%	12.0%
Health Care	Same weight	10.1%	10.1%
Consumer Discretionary	Same weight	7.1%	7.1%
Consumer Staples	Same weight	6.4%	6.4%
Materials	Same weight	5.8%	5.8%
Communication	Same weight	4.7%	4.7%
Energy	Same weight	4.0%	4.0%
Utilities	Same weight	3.6%	3.6%
Real Estate	Same weight	1.5%	1.5%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BUFI and IJUL, widest gap first
Country	More in BUFIMore in IJUL	BUFI	IJUL
Japan	Same weight	24.3%	24.3%
United Kingdom	Same weight	14.1%	14.1%
Switzerland	Same weight	10.2%	10.2%
Germany	Same weight	8.8%	8.8%
France	Same weight	8.3%	8.3%
Australia	Same weight	6.7%	6.7%
Netherlands	Same weight	6.0%	6.0%
Spain	Same weight	3.7%	3.7%
Other countries (17)	Same weight	18.0%	18.0%

Outside the US: BUFI 99% developed, 1% emerging. IJUL 99% developed, 1% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

BUFI100.8%
IJUL101.9%

Securities held

BUFI3
IJUL3

Asset class

BUFI: Alternatives
IJUL: Equity

Holdings

Only in BUFI3
In both0
Only in IJUL3

Only in BUFI

3 securities, 100% of BUFI by weight

4EFA 10/30/26 C0.53 4EFA 10/30/26 C0.5399.50%
Alliancebernstein Govt Stif Ssc Fund 64BA Agis 5871.12%
4EFA 10/30/26 P103.47 4EFA 10/30/26 P103.470.20%

Only in IJUL

3 securities, 100% of IJUL by weight

Efa 06/30/2027 1.04 C96.70%
Efa 06/30/2027 103.88 P4.92%
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.26%

Weight gaps

BUFI and IJUL share no securities.

All BUFI holdings⁠All 6 IJUL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFI vs IJUL Cost

Overpaying IJUL vs BUFI

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

BUFI 0.69%
$13,429
IJUL 0.85%
$16,199

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

BUFI 0.69%
IJUL 0.85%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	BUFI	IJUL	Overpaying
10	$1,232	$1,508	$276
20	$4,697	$5,706	$1,009
30	$13,429	$16,199	$2,770

Expense ratio

0.69%BUFI, cheaper
0.85%IJUL

BUFI0.69%IJUL0.85%

0.30%0.90%

Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Median 0.85%

BUFI 5th cheapest of 26 funds

IJUL 11th cheapest of 26 funds

BUFI vs IJUL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): BUFI No data; IJUL 0.00%
Payout (12M): BUFI None; IJUL None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

BUFIAll BUFI payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IJUL1 paymentAll IJUL payments⁠

BUFI vs IJUL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: BUFI 5.7%since Jan 2025IJUL 7.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: BUFI 1.21since Jan 2025IJUL 1.07
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: BUFI −7.4%since Dec 2024IJUL −14.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: BUFI 0.24IJUL 0.46; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

BUFIBvsQBIFB
AB International Buffer ETF · AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF
Expense ratio
0.69% · 0.74%
Category
IJULBvsQBIFB
Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.74%
Category
BUFIBvsIAUGB
AB International Buffer ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF
Expense ratio
0.69% · 0.85%
Category
IJULBvsIAUGB
Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.85%
Category
BUFIBvsIOCTB
AB International Buffer ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF
Expense ratio
0.69% · 0.85%
Category
IJULBvsIOCTB
Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.85%
Category