KOCT ranks 3rd and BUFS 12th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFS vs KOCT
KOCT −0.22pt a year
1.01%0.79%
BUFS 1.1×the volume
32.4K28.7K
BUFS vs KOCT Performance
+9.4%+13.8%
- BUFS 1.01%
- KOCT 0.79%, better
- BUFS $200M
- KOCT $171M
- BUFS +9.4%
- KOCT +13.8%, better
- BUFS
- KOCT 0.00%
- BUFS 5
- KOCT 3
- BUFS 32.4K sh, better
- KOCT 28.7K sh
- BUFS $24.82
- KOCT $37.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFS | KOCT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | C40Higher |
| Mission | A89 | |
| Risk | C54 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | A72 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | A83 | A87Higher |
Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFS and KOCT are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFSD
KOCTB
In short
BUFS Most buffer funds make you pick a start month and live with it. BUFS ladders First Trust's small-cap buffer funds instead, so one ticker holds several outcome periods at different stages.
KOCT Small-cap exposure with a seatbelt. KOCT tracks IWM up to a yearly cap while absorbing the first 15% of losses, resetting each October 1. A 2019 original in a corner where most buffer funds are built on the S&P 500.
Stated mandate
BUFS The fund seeks capital appreciation by providing small-cap equity exposure through a laddered portfolio of FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETFs while attempting to limit downside risk.
KOCT The Fund seeks to track the return of the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFS vs KOCT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFS vs KOCT Cost
Overpaying BUFS vs KOCT
$3,676
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFS 1.01%
$18,850
KOCT 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFS | KOCT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $1,405 | $375 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $5,331 | $1,355 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $15,174 | $3,676 |
- 1.01%BUFS
- 0.79%KOCT, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.77%
KOCT 8th cheapest of 14 funds
BUFS 14th cheapest of 14 funds
BUFS vs KOCT Dividends
- BUFS
- KOCT 0.00%
- BUFS None
- KOCT None
Distribution history
BUFS vs KOCT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFS 8.2%KOCT 8.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFS 0.61KOCT 1.17
- Worst fall
- BUFS −15.0%KOCT −16.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFS 0.53KOCT 0.69
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.