OKTG ranks 3rd and CATG 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CATG vs OKTG
8.0%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.75%0.75%
CATG 2.0×the volume
76.5K37.8K
CATG vs OKTG Performance
−53.5%+16.9%
- CATG 0.75%
- OKTG 0.75%
- CATG $4M
- OKTG $5M
- CATG 4
- OKTG 6
- CATG 76.5K sh, better
- OKTG 37.8K sh
- CATG $4.67
- OKTG $34.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CATG | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A95 |
| Risk | C47 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C43 | C50Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CATG and OKTG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CATGC
OKTGA
In short
CATG Most 2x single-stock ETFs chase megacap tech. CATG points the same daily-reset machinery at Caterpillar, the yellow-iron bellwether of construction, mining and global capex, aiming for twice CAT's daily move at a below-average fee.
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
CATG The fund seeks to deliver twice the daily performance of Caterpillar Inc. stock, before fees and expenses.
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CATG vs OKTG Holdings
How CATG and OKTG differ
8.0%
Shared holdings make up 10.1% of CATG and 8.0% of OKTG.
About this figure: CATG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
OKTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings8.0%
Sector
No Sector split for CATG and OKTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CATGMore in OKTG | Gap | CATG | OKTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CATG210.1%
- OKTG208.0%
- CATG1
- OKTG1
Asset class
- CATG
- Stocks
- OKTG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in CATG0
- In both1
- Only in OKTG0
Only in CATG
0 securities, 0.0% of CATG by weight
Only in OKTG
0 securities, 0.0% of OKTG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in CATGMore in OKTG | Gap | CATG | OKTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | CATG +2.12 points | 10.15% | 8.03% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CATG vs OKTG Cost
Same expense ratio
$14,482
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CATG 0.75%
$14,482
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CATG | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,336 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,078 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,482 |
- 0.75%CATG
- 0.75%OKTG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
CATG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
OKTG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
CATG vs OKTG Dividends
- CATG None
- OKTG None
Distribution history
CATG vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- CATG −2.25OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.