Skip to content

CBIL vs XHLF

Corgi 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF

CBILBCboe

BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF

XHLFANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XHLF −0.02pt a year

CBIL0.05%XHLF0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

XHLF 11.8×the volume

CBIL25.7KXHLF304K

CBIL vs XHLF Performance

Aug 4, 2026 – Nov 4, 2026

+1.0%CBIL+0.9%XHLF

Aug 4, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026. CBIL +1.0%. XHLF +0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.2%0.4%0.6%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CBIL 0.05%
XHLF 0.03%, better
Fund size
CBIL $25M
XHLF $2.03B
1Y total return
CBIL No data
XHLF +3.6%
Yield (12M)
CBIL No data
XHLF 3.68%
Holdings
CBIL 24
XHLF 29
Avg volume (30D)
CBIL 25.7K sh
XHLF 304K sh, better
NAV per share
CBIL $24.83
XHLF $50.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CBIL: Cost 95, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 19, Holdings 48, Durability 10. XHLF: Cost 99, Risk 44, Mission 100, Tradability 78, Holdings 32, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for CBIL, XHLF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCBILXHLF
Cost30% weightA95A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA100
Risk15% weightC54HigherC44
Tradability15% weightF19A78Higher
Holdings10% weightC48HigherD32
Durability5% weightF10B59Higher

Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CBIL and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Cash & Ultra-Short Income⁠

Category · 78 funds
See all 78 ›

XHLF ranks 7th and CBIL 40th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.

  1. Rank 5ATBLLInvesco Short Term Treasury ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 7AXHLFBondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 8ABILState Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 38BMMKState Street Prime Money Market ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 40BCBILCorgi 3-12 Month T-Bill ETFScore 59
  6. Rank 40BDLUXDoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CBILBCorgi 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF

XHLFABondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF

In short

CBIL No data

XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.

Stated mandate

CBIL No data

XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.

Why people hold it

CBIL No data

  • XHLF Costs 0.03% a year, against a typical short-Treasury peer near 0.14%. In cash-like funds, where returns come from bills everyone owns, fee is the main lever.
  • Tracks an index built to hold an average duration of roughly six months, rebalanced monthly, so exposure stays anchored instead of drifting as bills mature.bondbloxxetf.com
  • Sits in the gap between 0-3 month bill funds and one-year funds. Its sibling XONE targets a one-year duration at the same 0.03%, so the two can be mixed to dial in duration.
  • US Treasury bills only, no credit bets hiding in the portfolio, run in a multi-billion-dollar fund that has stayed close to its index.

Worth knowing

CBIL No data

  • XHLF Six months of duration is not zero. Prices move a touch more when yields shift than in 0-3 month bill funds such as BIL or CLIP.
  • Income rides whatever Treasury bills happen to pay, and distributions arrive on an irregular rhythm rather than a fixed amount or schedule.
  • Volume is moderate next to the largest bill ETFs, so spreads can be a bit wider, which matters more on big tickets than small ones.

Full CBIL profile⁠

Full XHLF profile⁠

CBIL vs XHLF Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CBIL vs XHLF Cost

Overpaying CBIL vs XHLF

$422

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CBIL 0.05%

    $1,060

  • XHLF 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CBIL 0.05%
  • XHLF 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$250$500$750$1K$1.25K051015202530CBIL $1,060XHLF $638

Year by year

YearCBILXHLFOverpaying
10$92$55$37
20$360$216$144
30$1,060$638$422

Expense ratio

  • 0.05%CBIL
  • 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
  • Median 0.18%

XHLF cheapest of 78 funds

CBIL 3rd cheapest of 78 funds

CBIL vs XHLF Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 4, 2026
Yield (12M)
CBIL No data
XHLF 3.68%
Payout (12M)
CBIL No data
XHLF $1.85
Last payment
CBIL $0.06
XHLF $0.16
Ex-dividend
CBIL Oct 30, 2026
XHLF Nov 2, 2026
Paid on
CBIL Nov 2, 2026
XHLF Pays Nov 5, 2026
Frequency
CBIL Monthly
XHLF Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CBILMonthly · 5 paymentsAll CBIL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 30, 2026 $0.04; Jul 31, 2026 $0.08; Aug 31, 2026 $0.32; Sep 30, 2026 $0.05; Oct 30, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
XHLFMonthly · 46 paymentsAll XHLF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Feb 1, 2023 $0.15; Mar 1, 2023 $0.14; Apr 3, 2023 $0.17; May 1, 2023 $0.14; Jun 1, 2023 $0.22; Jul 3, 2023 $0.15; Aug 1, 2023 $0.21; Sep 1, 2023 $0.22; Oct 2, 2023 $0.19; Nov 1, 2023 $0.22; Dec 1, 2023 $0.21; Dec 28, 2023 $0.23; Feb 1, 2024 $0.23; Mar 1, 2024 $0.20; Apr 1, 2024 $0.22; May 1, 2024 $0.21; Jun 3, 2024 $0.22; Jul 1, 2024 $0.21; Aug 1, 2024 $0.21; Sep 3, 2024 $0.21; Oct 1, 2024 $0.20; Nov 1, 2024 $0.20; Dec 2, 2024 $0.19; Dec 30, 2024 $0.19; Feb 3, 2025 $0.17; Mar 3, 2025 $0.17; Apr 1, 2025 $0.18; May 1, 2025 $0.15; Jun 2, 2025 $0.17; Jul 1, 2025 $0.16; Aug 1, 2025 $0.16; Sep 2, 2025 $0.17; Oct 1, 2025 $0.16; Nov 3, 2025 $0.20; Dec 1, 2025 $0.14; Dec 30, 2025 $0.16; Feb 2, 2026 $0.16; Mar 2, 2026 $0.14; Apr 1, 2026 $0.16; May 1, 2026 $0.15; Jun 1, 2026 $0.15; Jul 1, 2026 $0.15; Aug 3, 2026 $0.15; Sep 1, 2026 $0.16; Oct 1, 2026 $0.15; Nov 2, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

CBIL vs XHLF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CBIL No dataXHLF 0.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CBIL No dataXHLF −0.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CBIL No dataXHLF −0.1%since Sep 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CBIL −0.37XHLF 0.03

Popular comparisons

  • CBILBvsICSHA

    Corgi 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF · iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XHLFAvsSGOVA

    BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF · iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CBILBvsCLIPA

    Corgi 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF · Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XHLFAvsICSHA

    BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF · iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CBILBvsVBILA

    Corgi 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF · Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XHLFAvsCLIPA

    BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF · Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.