LOWV ranks 4th and CCOR 9th of 10 funds in the US Active Low Volatility Category.
CCOR vs LOWV
LOWV −0.77pt a year
1.16%0.39%
LOWV 2.5×the volume
3.05K7.72K
LOWV +17.1pt
−0.6%+16.5%
CCOR vs LOWV Performance
+5.4%+8.9%
- CCOR 1.16%
- LOWV 0.39%, better
- CCOR $26M
- LOWV $207M
- CCOR +5.4%
- LOWV +8.9%, better
- CCOR 0.94%, better
- LOWV 0.84%
- CCOR 41
- LOWV 73
- CCOR 3.05K sh
- LOWV 7.72K sh, better
- CCOR $26.74
- LOWV $84.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CCOR | LOWV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | B66Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | C42 | C45Higher |
| Tradability | F16 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | B55Higher |
| Durability | C47 | B62Higher |
Rank among US Active Low Volatility funds
Same Category. CCOR and LOWV are both graded against the same 10 US Active Low Volatility funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CCORD
LOWVB
In short
CCOR Hedged equity that buys its hedge instead of selling calls: about 40 large-cap growth and quality names ringed by long S&P 500 put options, aiming for low correlation to the broad market. Active since 2017.
LOWV A stock picker's answer to low volatility. AB runs about 70 US large caps through its own quality, profitability and value screen instead of tracking a published low-vol index, at 0.39% a year.
Stated mandate
CCOR The Fund seeks capital appreciation and preservation with low correlation to the broader U.S. equity market. It combines a concentrated large-cap long-equity portfolio with S&P 500 put options intended to reduce downside risk and seek positive returns during equity declines.
LOWV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio primarily invested in U.S. large-cap equities, with an emphasis on lower volatility than the broader equity market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CCOR vs LOWV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CCOR vs LOWV Cost
Overpaying CCOR vs LOWV
$13,334
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CCOR 1.16%
$21,232
LOWV 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CCOR | LOWV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,032 | $705 | $1,327 |
| 20 | $7,580 | $2,725 | $4,855 |
| 30 | $21,232 | $7,898 | $13,334 |
- 1.16%CCOR
- 0.39%LOWV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Low Volatility funds
- Median 0.47%
LOWV 4th cheapest of 10 funds
CCOR 9th cheapest of 10 funds
CCOR vs LOWV Dividends
- CCOR 0.94%, better
- LOWV 0.84%
- CCOR $0.25
- LOWV $0.71
- CCOR $0.05
- LOWV $0.18
- CCOR Sep 17, 2026
- LOWV Sep 18, 2026
- CCOR Sep 18, 2026
- LOWV Sep 21, 2026
- CCOR Quarterly
- LOWV Quarterly
Distribution history
CCOR vs LOWV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CCOR 9.3%, betterLOWV 9.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CCOR −0.44LOWV 1.24, better
- Worst fall
- CCOR −23.0%LOWV −13.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CCOR −0.04LOWV 0.73
Popular comparisons
- 1.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.16% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.16% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.