LGLV ranks 1st and CFO 12th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
CFO vs LGLV
LGLV −0.23pt a year
0.35%0.12%
LGLV 5.2×the volume
5.15K26.6K
LGLV +2.1pt
+9.8%+11.9%
CFO vs LGLV Performance
+20.4%+45.7%
- CFO 0.35%
- LGLV 0.12%, better
- CFO $414M
- LGLV $1.2B
- CFO +13.8%, better
- LGLV +11.7%
- CFO 1.21%
- LGLV 2.06%, better
- CFO 501
- LGLV 174
- CFO 5.15K sh
- LGLV 26.6K sh, better
- CFO $81.90
- LGLV $187.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CFO | LGLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A93Higher |
| Risk | C40 | C44Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | C52 |
| Durability | B59 | A74Higher |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. CFO and LGLV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CFOC
LGLVA
In short
CFO Most low-vol ETFs tilt toward calm stocks and stay invested. CFO does that, then adds a rules-based escape hatch: after a big enough drop from the high, the index shifts most of the portfolio to cash, then steps back in by formula.
LGLV Most low-vol funds run an optimizer. LGLV just ranks the biggest 1,000 US stocks by how calm they have been and gives the quietest ones the heaviest weights, for 0.12% a year.
Stated mandate
CFO The Fund seeks to track the performance of the CEMP US Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index before fees and expenses.
LGLV The fund is designed to provide exposure to U.S. large-capitalization equities selected through a low-volatility index strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CFO vs LGLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CFO vs LGLV Cost
Overpaying CFO vs LGLV
$4,606
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CFO 0.35%
$7,126
LGLV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CFO | LGLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $220 | $414 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $859 | $1,595 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $2,520 | $4,606 |
- 0.35%CFO
- 0.12%LGLV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
LGLV 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
CFO 14th cheapest of 16 funds
CFO vs LGLV Dividends
- CFO 1.21%
- LGLV 2.06%, better
- CFO $0.99
- LGLV $3.88
- CFO $0.08
- LGLV $0.99
- CFO Oct 8, 2026
- LGLV Sep 21, 2026
- CFO Oct 9, 2026
- LGLV Sep 23, 2026
- CFO Monthly
- LGLV Quarterly
Distribution history
CFO vs LGLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CFO
- LGLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CFO 11.3%, betterLGLV 11.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- CFO 0.88, betterLGLV 0.86
- Worst fall
- CFO −24.3%LGLV −17.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CFO 0.65LGLV 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.