SPAB ranks 2nd and CGCP 35th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
CGCP vs SPAB
SPAB −0.31pt a year
0.34%0.03%
SPAB 1.7×the volume
1.88M3.11M
CGCP +0.6pt
+6.0%+5.4%
CGCP vs SPAB Performance
−0.2%−0.2%
- CGCP 0.34%
- SPAB 0.03%, better
- CGCP $8.61B
- SPAB $10.4B
- CGCP −0.2%
- SPAB −0.2%
- CGCP 5.64%, better
- SPAB 4.20%
- CGCP 1449
- SPAB 8697
- CGCP 1.88M sh
- SPAB 3.11M sh, better
- CGCP $21.55
- SPAB $24.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGCP | SPAB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A82 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A71 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. CGCP and SPAB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGCPB
SPABA
In short
CGCP Capital Group's 2022 ETF debut class produced this one: an active core-plus bond fund that hunts value across the credit spectrum instead of cloning the Agg, and pays income monthly.
SPAB A 2007-vintage core bond fund priced at 0.03%: roughly 8,500 US investment-grade bonds in one ticket, at the same rock-bottom fee the household names charge for the same index.
Stated mandate
CGCP The fund seeks current income and maximum total return while preserving capital.
SPAB The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGCP vs SPAB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGCP vs SPAB Cost
Overpaying CGCP vs SPAB
$6,294
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGCP 0.34%
$6,932
SPAB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGCP | SPAB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $55 | $561 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $216 | $2,170 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $638 | $6,294 |
- 0.34%CGCP
- 0.03%SPAB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SPAB 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
CGCP 58th cheapest of 114 funds
CGCP vs SPAB Dividends
- CGCP 5.64%, better
- SPAB 4.20%
- CGCP $1.22
- SPAB $1.04
- CGCP $0.09
- SPAB $0.09
- CGCP Oct 30, 2026
- SPAB Oct 1, 2026
- CGCP Pays Nov 2, 2026
- SPAB Oct 6, 2026
- CGCP Monthly
- SPAB Monthly
Distribution history
CGCP vs SPAB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGCP 5.6%SPAB 5.6%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- CGCP 0.28, betterSPAB 0.17
- Worst fall
- CGCP −15.1%SPAB −17.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CGCP 0.95SPAB 1.00
CGCP and SPAB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

