Skip to content

CGCV vs TOAK

Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF

CGCVANYSE Arca

Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF

TOAKANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

TOAK −0.07pt a year

CGCV0.33%TOAK0.26%

Avg volume · 30D

CGCV 27.3×the volume

CGCV297KTOAK10.9K

CGCV vs TOAK Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+13.6%CGCV+3.6%TOAK

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CGCV +13.6%. TOAK +3.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CGCV 0.33%
TOAK 0.26%, better
Fund size
CGCV $2.24B
TOAK $101M
1Y total return
CGCV +13.6%, better
TOAK +3.6%
Yield (12M)
CGCV 1.54%
TOAK No data
Holdings
CGCV 76
TOAK 3
Avg volume (30D)
CGCV 297K sh, better
TOAK 10.9K sh
NAV per share
CGCV $33.52
TOAK $29.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CGCV: Cost 76, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 71, Holdings 67, Durability 81. TOAK: Cost 86, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings not scored, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for CGCV, TOAK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCGCVTOAK
Cost30% weightA76A86Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherB61
Tradability15% weightA71HigherB60
Holdings10% weightB67Not scored
Durability5% weightA81HigherC47

Rank among US Active Low Volatility funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CGCV and TOAK are both graded against the same 10 US Active Low Volatility funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Low Volatility⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

CGCV ranks 2nd and TOAK 3rd of 10 funds in the US Active Low Volatility Category.

  1. Rank 1ASELVSEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACGCVCapital Group Conservative Equity ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3ATOAKTwin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BLOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CGCVACapital Group Conservative Equity ETF

TOAKATwin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF

In short

CGCV Capital Group's stock pickers took on a three-part job in one equity fund: current income, capital growth, and preservation of principal. Roughly 100 US names, actively chosen, priced under most defensive-equity rivals.

TOAK Shelved with low-volatility equity funds, TOAK owns no stocks. It runs a paired options book with a zero-to-one-year horizon, each position's maximum loss limited to the premium paid, at 0.26% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

CGCV The fund seeks to balance current income, capital growth, and preservation of principal.

TOAK The Fund seeks capital appreciation with low price volatility, which the Adviser describes as stable returns. It pursues this through defined-risk options intended to generate an absolute return over a short, zero-to-one-year duration.

Why people hold it

  • CGCV Charges 0.33% a year against a 0.47% median for its defensive US equity group, which is unusual for an actively run fund rather than an index tracker.
  • The mandate is spelled out in the prospectus, not implied by a label: balance current income, capital growth, and preservation of principal.
  • About 100 US stocks, picked by managers rather than pulled from an index, with cash paid out quarterly.
  • Already a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades smoothly for its age, and one of the stronger builds in a small low-volatility peer group.
  • TOAK Defined risk is written into the strategy: the most any single option position can lose in an expiry period is the premium paid, and the fund states it uses no leverage and sells no naked options.sec.gov
  • 0.26% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (0.46% gross) sits below the category median and under peers such as LOWV at 0.39% and SIXL at 0.46%.
  • Long calls are always paired with long puts (and call spreads with put spreads), legs that tend to move against each other. That pairing is the stated engine behind the low-volatility half of the mandate.sec.gov
  • Different wiring from its shelf-mates: an absolute-return options sleeve on broad US equity exposure rather than a screened basket of defensive stocks, and it stands in the upper half of that peer group.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • CGCV Preservation of principal is a stated goal, not a floor. This is a stock fund, and it can fall when the market does.
  • It launched in 2024, so there is only a short stretch of live data behind any read on how it handles rough markets.
  • Cheaper defensive shelf-mates exist: SELV runs at 0.15% and TOAK at 0.25%, though both take different routes to lower volatility.
  • TOAK Launched in 2024, so the track record is short and covers only one market stretch. It is also a smaller fund than most names on this shelf.
  • Thinly traded for its category, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the big liquid names. Limit orders matter more here.
  • No income stream: the fund has not been paying distributions, so whatever the options book produces shows up in share price, not as yield.

Full CGCV profile⁠

Full TOAK profile⁠

CGCV vs TOAK Holdings

How CGCV and TOAK differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CGCV and 0.0% of TOAK.

Level by level

  • Asset classEquity, Alternatives0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for TOAK.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for TOAK.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CGCV32.6%
  • TOAK100.0%

Securities held

  • CGCV72
  • TOAK2

Asset class

CGCV
Equity
TOAK
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in CGCV72
  • In both0
  • Only in TOAK2

Only in CGCV

72 securities, 98.2% of CGCV by weight

  • Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.000006256.07%
  • Broadcom Inc Common Stock3.75%
  • Philip Morris International Common Stock3.63%

Only in TOAK

2 securities, 99.9% of TOAK by weight

  • Qqq 01/15/2027 20.01 C67.64%
  • Qqq 01/15/2027 1020.01 P32.28%

Weight gaps

CGCV and TOAK share no securities.

All 95 CGCV holdings⁠All TOAK holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CGCV vs TOAK Cost

Overpaying CGCV vs TOAK

$1,379

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CGCV 0.33%

    $6,737

  • TOAK 0.26%

    $5,358

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CGCV 0.33%
  • TOAK 0.26%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530CGCV $6,737TOAK $5,358

Year by year

YearCGCVTOAKOverpaying
10$598$473$125
20$2,318$1,838$480
30$6,737$5,358$1,379

Expense ratio

  • 0.33%CGCV
  • 0.26%TOAK, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Low Volatility funds
  • Median 0.47%

TOAK 2nd cheapest of 10 funds

CGCV 3rd cheapest of 10 funds

CGCV vs TOAK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CGCV 1.54%
TOAK No data
Payout (12M)
CGCV $0.52
TOAK None
Last payment
CGCV $0.13
TOAK No data
Ex-dividend
CGCV Sep 30, 2026
TOAK No data
Paid on
CGCV Oct 1, 2026
TOAK No data
Frequency
CGCV Quarterly
TOAK No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

CGCVQuarterly · 9 paymentsAll CGCV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Sep 30, 2024 $0.08; Dec 26, 2024 $0.10; Mar 31, 2025 $0.10; Jun 30, 2025 $0.11; Sep 30, 2025 $0.09; Dec 26, 2025 $0.14; Mar 31, 2026 $0.13; Jun 30, 2026 $0.12; Sep 30, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
TOAKAll TOAK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CGCV vs TOAK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CGCV 10.1%since Jul 2024TOAK 0.3%since Sep 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CGCV 1.06since Jul 2024TOAK −0.72since Sep 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CGCV −13.1%since Jun 2024TOAK −1.8%since Aug 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CGCV 0.67TOAK 0.0003

CGCV and TOAK in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CGCVAvsSELVA

    Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF · SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsSELVA

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGCVAvsLOWVB

    Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF · AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsLOWVB

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGCVAvsSIXLB

    Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF · ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsSIXLB

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.