CGDV ranks 1st and SWP 37th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.
CGDV vs SWP
CGDV −0.66pt a year
0.33%0.99%
CGDV 417.5×the volume
3.4M8.14K
CGDV vs SWP Performance
+15.9%+6.8%
- CGDV 0.33%, better
- SWP 0.99%
- CGDV $40.2B
- SWP $145M
- CGDV +15.9%, better
- SWP +6.8%
- CGDV 1.23%
- SWP 9.57%, better
- CGDV 57
- SWP 43
- CGDV 3.4M sh, better
- SWP 8.14K sh
- CGDV $48.81
- SWP $27.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGDV | SWP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | C46Higher | F18 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | C47 | B58Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | C51 |
Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds
Same Category. CGDV and SWP are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGDVA
SWPF
In short
CGDV A stock picker's dividend fund at near-index pricing: 0.33% a year, roughly 60 names, and a mandate for above-average yield plus growth. Live since 2022 and already grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund.
Stated mandate
CGDV The fund seeks income above the average yield of U.S. stocks while also offering capital-growth potential.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGDV vs SWP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGDV vs SWP Cost
Overpaying SWP vs CGDV
$11,788
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGDV 0.33%
$6,737
SWP 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGDV | SWP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $1,746 | $1,148 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $6,565 | $4,247 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $18,525 | $11,788 |
- 0.33%CGDV, cheaper
- 0.99%SWP
- Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
- Median 0.50%
CGDV 2nd cheapest of 40 funds
SWP 40th cheapest of 40 funds
CGDV vs SWP Dividends
- CGDV 1.23%
- SWP 9.57%, better
- CGDV $0.60
- SWP $2.62
- CGDV $0.15
- SWP $0.57
- CGDV Sep 30, 2026
- SWP Sep 29, 2026
- CGDV Oct 1, 2026
- SWP Sep 30, 2026
- CGDV Quarterly
- SWP Quarterly
Distribution history
CGDV vs SWP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGDV 11.9%SWP 11.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- CGDV 1.59SWP 0.59
- Worst fall
- CGDV −21.8%SWP −16.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CGDV 0.90SWP 0.96
CGDV and SWP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

