CGHM ranks 1st and FCAL 16th of 18 funds in the High-Yield Municipal Bonds Category.
CGHM vs FCAL
CGHM −0.31pt a year
0.34%0.65%
CGHM 30.1×the volume
865K28.8K
CGHM vs FCAL Performance
+1.3%+0.1%
- CGHM 0.34%, better
- FCAL 0.65%
- CGHM $3.73B
- FCAL $212M
- CGHM +1.3%, better
- FCAL +0.1%
- CGHM 4.73%, better
- FCAL 3.56%
- CGHM 3766
- FCAL 280
- CGHM 865K sh, better
- FCAL 28.8K sh
- CGHM $24.72
- FCAL $47.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGHM | FCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A92 |
| Risk | B61Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | A94Higher | B61 |
| Durability | B67Higher | C52 |
Rank among High-Yield Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. CGHM and FCAL are both graded against the same 18 High-Yield Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGHMA
FCALC
In short
CGHM Index high-yield muni funds stop where the ratings stop. CGHM is Capital Group's active version: built to lean into lower-rated and unrated tax-exempt bonds, with the income paid out monthly.
FCAL A California-only muni fund that actually reaches for yield: at least half investment grade, up to half high yield, actively picked. Double tax exemption at home, at 0.65% a year.
Stated mandate
CGHM The fund seeks a high level of current income that is exempt from regular federal income tax.
FCAL FCAL seeks current income exempt from regular federal and California income taxes, with long-term capital appreciation as a secondary objective. Normally, it invests at least 80% of net assets in municipal debt securities whose interest is exempt from those taxes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGHM vs FCAL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGHM vs FCAL Cost
Overpaying FCAL vs CGHM
$5,785
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGHM 0.34%
$6,932
FCAL 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGHM | FCAL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $1,163 | $547 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $4,440 | $2,054 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $12,717 | $5,785 |
- 0.34%CGHM, cheaper
- 0.65%FCAL
- Middle half of High-Yield Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.39%
CGHM 5th cheapest of 18 funds
FCAL 16th cheapest of 18 funds
CGHM vs FCAL Dividends
- CGHM 4.73%, better
- FCAL 3.56%
- CGHM $1.17
- FCAL $1.70
- CGHM $0.09
- FCAL $0.15
- CGHM Oct 30, 2026
- FCAL Oct 21, 2026
- CGHM Pays Nov 2, 2026
- FCAL Oct 30, 2026
- CGHM Monthly
- FCAL Monthly
Distribution history
CGHM vs FCAL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGHM 5.7%FCAL 5.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGHM −0.12FCAL −0.07
- Worst fall
- CGHM −6.8%FCAL −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CGHM 0.20FCAL 0.85
CGHM and FCAL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
