CGHM ranks 1st and FTMH 6th of 18 funds in the High-Yield Municipal Bonds Category.
CGHM vs FTMH
CGHM −0.01pt a year
0.34%0.35%
CGHM 1.8×the volume
865K470K
CGHM vs FTMH Performance
+1.3%+0.5%
- CGHM 0.34%, better
- FTMH 0.35%
- CGHM $3.73B
- FTMH $690M
- CGHM +1.3%, better
- FTMH +0.5%
- CGHM 4.73%
- FTMH
- CGHM 3766
- FTMH 567
- CGHM 865K sh, better
- FTMH 470K sh
- CGHM $24.72
- FTMH $11.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGHM | FTMH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | B67 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A89 |
| Risk | B61Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | B69 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | A94Higher | B62 |
| Durability | B67 | B69Higher |
Rank among High-Yield Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. CGHM and FTMH are both graded against the same 18 High-Yield Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGHMA
FTMHB
In short
CGHM Index high-yield muni funds stop where the ratings stop. CGHM is Capital Group's active version: built to lean into lower-rated and unrated tax-exempt bonds, with the income paid out monthly.
FTMH Most muni ETFs are cheap index trackers. FTMH works the other side of the street: an active hunt for tax-exempt income in the muni market's lower-rated corners, off a strategy whose track record starts in 1985.
Stated mandate
CGHM The fund seeks a high level of current income that is exempt from regular federal income tax.
FTMH The fund seeks high current income exempt from federal income tax.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGHM vs FTMH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGHM vs FTMH Cost
Overpaying FTMH vs CGHM
$194
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGHM 0.34%
$6,932
FTMH 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGHM | FTMH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $634 | $18 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $2,454 | $68 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $7,126 | $194 |
- 0.34%CGHM, cheaper
- 0.35%FTMH
- Middle half of High-Yield Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.39%
CGHM 5th cheapest of 18 funds
FTMH 6th cheapest of 18 funds
CGHM vs FTMH Dividends
- CGHM 4.73%
- FTMH
- CGHM $1.17
- FTMH
- CGHM $0.09
- FTMH $0.05
- CGHM Oct 30, 2026
- FTMH Oct 1, 2026
- CGHM Pays Nov 2, 2026
- FTMH Oct 6, 2026
- CGHM Monthly
- FTMH Monthly
Distribution history
CGHM vs FTMH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGHM 5.7%FTMH 8.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGHM −0.12FTMH −0.36
- Worst fall
- CGHM −6.8%FTMH −8.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CGHM 0.20FTMH 0.19
CGHM and FTMH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
