WTV ranks 1st and CGVV 14th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
CGVV vs WTV
WTV −0.21pt a year
0.33%0.12%
WTV 3.3×the volume
51.4K167K
CGVV vs WTV Performance
+21.1%+20.9%
- CGVV 0.33%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- CGVV $147M
- WTV $3.33B
- CGVV +21.1%, better
- WTV +20.9%
- CGVV
- WTV 2.00%
- CGVV 67
- WTV 126
- CGVV 51.4K sh
- WTV 167K sh, better
- CGVV $30.90
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGVV | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79 | A100Higher |
| Mission | B59 | |
| Risk | D38 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | A72 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B56 | A90Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. CGVV and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGVVB
WTVA
In short
CGVV Capital Group's active swing at large-cap value, measured against the Russell 1000 Value Index and priced at 0.33%, well under what active value funds usually charge. It opened in 2025, so the record is short.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
CGVV The fund seeks capital appreciation and typically invests at least 80% of net assets in common stocks and other equity-type securities.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGVV vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGVV vs WTV Cost
Overpaying CGVV vs WTV
$4,217
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGVV 0.33%
$6,737
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGVV | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $220 | $378 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $859 | $1,459 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $2,520 | $4,217 |
- 0.33%CGVV
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
CGVV 13th cheapest of 64 funds
CGVV vs WTV Dividends
- CGVV
- WTV 2.00%
- CGVV
- WTV $2.14
- CGVV $0.11
- WTV $0.55
- CGVV Jun 30, 2026
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- CGVV Jul 1, 2026
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- CGVV Twice a year
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
CGVV vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGVV 13.7%WTV 13.7%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- CGVV 0.98WTV 1.33
- Worst fall
- CGVV −10.1%WTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- CGVV 0.87WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.