Skip to content

CHGX vs KLMN

Stance Sustainable Beta ETF

CHGXCNasdaq

Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF

KLMNANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

KLMN −0.40pt a year

CHGX0.49%KLMN0.09%

Avg volume · 30D

KLMN 27.9×the volume

CHGX17.5KKLMN489K

CHGX vs KLMN Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+22.4%CHGX+13.7%KLMN

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. CHGX +22.4%. KLMN +13.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%10%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CHGX 0.49%
KLMN 0.09%, better
Fund size
CHGX $178M
KLMN $1.94B
1Y total return
CHGX +22.4%, better
KLMN +13.7%
Yield (12M)
CHGX 0.55%
KLMN 1.17%, better
Holdings
CHGX 102
KLMN 275
Avg volume (30D)
CHGX 17.5K sh
KLMN 489K sh, better
NAV per share
CHGX $33.02
KLMN $30.21
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CHGX: Cost 17, Risk 38, Mission 99, Tradability 35, Holdings 79, Durability 50. KLMN: Cost 86, Risk 55, Mission 100, Tradability 83, Holdings 64, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for CHGX, KLMN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCHGXKLMN
Cost30% weightF17A86Higher
Mission25% weightA99A100Higher
Risk15% weightD38B55Higher
Tradability15% weightD35A83Higher
Holdings10% weightA79HigherB64
Durability5% weightC50B55Higher

Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CHGX and KLMN are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US ESG & Values Index⁠

Category · 47 funds
See all 47 ›

KLMN ranks 1st and CHGX 33rd of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AKLMNInvesco MSCI North America Climate ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AEFIVState Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 32CETHOAmplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 33CCHGXStance Sustainable Beta ETFScore 51
  5. Rank 33CNUDVNuveen ESG DividendScore 51

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CHGXCStance Sustainable Beta ETF

KLMNAInvesco MSCI North America Climate ETF

In short

CHGX Most ESG funds keep the S&P 500's shape and shave the edges. CHGX starts over: a fossil-fuel-free US large-cap index of roughly 100 names, each weighted about the same, so no mega-cap runs the show.

KLMN No data

Stated mandate

CHGX The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index.

KLMN No data

Why people hold it

  • CHGX The fossil fuel exclusion is written into the index itself, not layered on as a tilt: it tracks the Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index.
  • Equal weighting spreads roughly 100 US large caps evenly, so the portfolio does not lean on a handful of trillion-dollar names the way cap-weighted ESG funds like ESGV and EFIV do.
  • Live since 2017, with the same fossil-free mandate spelled out in its filings and a portfolio that closely matches it.

KLMN No data

Worth knowing

  • CHGX At 0.49% a year it runs about double the 0.25% cohort median, and the broad ESG index giants (XVV at 0.08%, ESGV at 0.09%) charge a fraction of that.
  • Thinly traded, which usually means wider bid-ask spreads and more price impact on big orders. Limit orders are the standard tool here.
  • Equal weight plus a fossil-fuel screen means results can diverge widely from the S&P 500 in both directions, especially when mega-cap tech or energy leads.

KLMN No data

Full CHGX profile⁠

Full KLMN profile⁠

CHGX vs KLMN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CHGX vs KLMN Cost

Overpaying CHGX vs KLMN

$7,894

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CHGX 0.49%

    $9,792

  • KLMN 0.09%

    $1,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CHGX 0.49%
  • KLMN 0.09%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530CHGX $9,792KLMN $1,898

Year by year

YearCHGXKLMNOverpaying
10$883$165$718
20$3,394$646$2,748
30$9,792$1,898$7,894

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%CHGX
  • 0.09%KLMN, cheaper
  • Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
  • Median 0.25%

KLMN 3rd cheapest of 47 funds

CHGX 38th cheapest of 47 funds

CHGX vs KLMN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
CHGX 0.55%
KLMN 1.17%, better
Payout (12M)
CHGX $0.18
KLMN $0.36
Last payment
CHGX $0.18
KLMN $0.08
Ex-dividend
CHGX Dec 16, 2025
KLMN Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
CHGX Dec 18, 2025
KLMN Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
CHGX Annual
KLMN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CHGXAnnual · 10 paymentsAll CHGX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.06; Dec 28, 2018 $0.21; Dec 23, 2019 $0.20; Dec 23, 2020 $0.17; Dec 22, 2021 $0.20; Dec 19, 2022 $0.30; Dec 18, 2023 $0.31; Dec 23, 2024 $0.18; Dec 30, 2024 $0.04; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
KLMNQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll KLMN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2025 $0.08; Jun 23, 2025 $0.10; Sep 22, 2025 $0.08; Dec 22, 2025 $0.09; Mar 23, 2026 $0.13; Jun 22, 2026 $0.07; Sep 21, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

CHGX vs KLMN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CHGX 25.9%KLMN 12.5%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CHGX 0.19KLMN 0.83since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CHGX −46.4%KLMN −18.5%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CHGX 1.07KLMN 1.02

Popular comparisons

  • CHGXCvsEFIVA

    Stance Sustainable Beta ETF · State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KLMNAvsEFIVA

    Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF · State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CHGXCvsSNPEA

    Stance Sustainable Beta ETF · Xtrackers S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KLMNAvsSNPEA

    Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF · Xtrackers S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CHGXCvsESGUA

    Stance Sustainable Beta ETF · iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KLMNAvsESGUA

    Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF · iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.