Skip to content

CLOC vs RCLY

AAM Crescent CLO ETF

CLOCBNYSE Arca

Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF

RCLYFNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.6%by weight

Expense ratio

CLOC −0.37pt a year

CLOC0.18%RCLY0.55%

Avg volume · 30D

CLOC 44.3×the volume

CLOC4.83KRCLY109

CLOC vs RCLY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.5%CLOC+1.2%RCLY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CLOC +1.5%. RCLY +1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.5%2%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CLOC 0.18%, better
RCLY 0.55%
Fund size
CLOC $61M
RCLY $18M
1Y total return
CLOC +5.5%
RCLY No data
Holdings
CLOC 63
RCLY 3
Avg volume (30D)
CLOC 4.83K sh, better
RCLY 109 sh
NAV per share
CLOC $24.81
RCLY $102.80
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CLOC: Cost 100, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings 49, Durability 46. RCLY: Cost 12, Risk 21, Mission not scored, Tradability 40, Holdings 19, Durability 12.
Pillar letters and Scores for CLOC, RCLY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCLOCRCLY
Cost30% weightA100HigherF12
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA71HigherF21
Tradability15% weightF12C40Higher
Holdings10% weightC49HigherF19
Durability5% weightC46HigherF12

Rank among Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CLOC and RCLY are both graded against the same 34 Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 34 ›

CLOC ranks 9th and RCLY 32nd of 34 funds in the Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) Category.

  1. Rank 8BCLOXEldridge AAA CLO ETFScore 68
  2. Rank 9BCLOCAAM Crescent CLO ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 10BFUSIAmerican Century Ultrashort Income ETFScore 64
  4. Rank 32FRCLRReckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETFScore 20
  5. Rank 32FRCLYReckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETFScore 20
  6. GCLONot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CLOCBAAM Crescent CLO ETF

RCLYFReckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF

In short

CLOC A 2025 arrival in the CLO aisle that undercuts the category on fee: 0.18% a year, below the typical CLO fund and below the giants it competes with. Its mandate leads with capital preservation, then low correlation and current income.

RCLY Most bond ETFs pay you monthly. RCLY is built the other way: exposure to BBB through B rated collateralized loan obligations with a stated mandate to make just one distribution a year.

Stated mandate

CLOC The Fund seeks capital preservation, low correlation with traditional asset classes, and current income.

RCLY The Fund seeks total return while targeting only one dividend or distribution payment each year.

Why people hold it

  • CLOC Cheapest seat in the CLO aisle: 0.18% a year against a 0.25% category median, and a step under the biggest AAA CLO funds (JAAA, CLOA, PAAA, FAAA, ACLO at 0.19%-0.20%).
  • The mandate is unusually explicit: capital preservation first, low correlation with traditional asset classes second, current income third.
  • Young, but it already stands in the upper half of a crowded 27-fund CLO group.
  • RCLY The mandate is unusual and explicit: seek total return while targeting a single dividend or distribution each year, so income lands as one annual event rather than twelve monthly ones.
  • It goes down the CLO stack. The category's largest funds (JAAA, CLOA, PAAA, FAAA) concentrate on AAA tranches; this one targets BBB through B rated slices instead.
  • Structurally simple: it is a wrapper on Reckoner's own BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO), so one portfolio runs the credit exposure while this fund handles the annual payout schedule.

Worth knowing

  • CLOC Thinly traded next to the multi-billion-dollar CLO names, so spreads can be wider and larger orders take patience.
  • Launched in October 2025, so the history is short and there is not yet a full credit cycle to judge it by.
  • Distributions have come on an irregular schedule rather than a fixed monthly rhythm, so income timing is less predictable.
  • RCLY Costs 0.55% a year, above the CLO ETF norm: the big AAA funds in the category charge about 0.20%, and the cohort median sits near a quarter point.
  • Launched in February 2026, so the track record is short, and it has been a small, lightly traded fund, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads.
  • BBB-B rated tranches sit below the AAA paper most CLO ETFs hold, so moves in credit stress can be larger. And by design, cash arrives once a year, not monthly.

Full CLOC profile⁠

Full RCLY profile⁠

CLOC vs RCLY Holdings

How CLOC and RCLY differ

Overlap by weight

0.6%

Shared holdings make up 2.3% of CLOC and 0.6% of RCLY.

Level by level

  • Asset classFixed Income, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.6%
  • Countryby domicile24.2%

Sector

No Sector split for CLOC and RCLY.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CLOC and RCLY, widest gap first
CountryMore in CLOCMore in RCLY
United StatesRCLY +75.8 points
Cayman IslandsCLOC +72.5 points
United KingdomCLOC +3.3 points

Outside the US: CLOC 4% developed, 96% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CLOC24.7%
  • RCLY100.0%

Securities held

  • CLOC62
  • RCLY1

Asset class

CLOC
Fixed Income
RCLY
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CLOC62
  • In both0
  • Only in RCLY1

Only in CLOC

62 securities, 97.7% of CLOC by weight

  • Apidos Loan Fund 2024-1 Ltd 6.774% 10/25/20382.54%
  • Maranon Loan Funding 2025-1 Ltd 9.1425% 10/15/20372.50%
  • Cerberus Loan Funding 50 LLC 6.6425% 07/15/20372.48%

Only in RCLY

1 security, 99.3% of RCLY by weight

  • Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF99.28%

Weight gaps

CLOC and RCLY share no securities.

All 63 CLOC holdings⁠All RCLY holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CLOC vs RCLY Cost

Overpaying RCLY vs CLOC

$7,155

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CLOC 0.18%

    $3,749

  • RCLY 0.55%

    $10,904

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CLOC 0.18%
  • RCLY 0.55%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530RCLY $10,904CLOC $3,749

Year by year

YearCLOCRCLYOverpaying
10$328$988$660
20$1,281$3,790$2,509
30$3,749$10,904$7,155

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%CLOC, cheaper
  • 0.55%RCLY
  • Middle half of Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds
  • Median 0.28%

CLOC cheapest of 34 funds

RCLY 30th cheapest of 34 funds

CLOC vs RCLY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CLOC No data
RCLY None
Last payment
CLOC $0.13
RCLY No data
Ex-dividend
CLOC Oct 30, 2026
RCLY No data
Paid on
CLOC Pays Nov 3, 2026
RCLY No data
Frequency
CLOC Monthly
RCLY No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

CLOCMonthly · 12 paymentsAll CLOC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 12 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Nov 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 31, 2025 $0.17; Jan 30, 2026 $0.13; Feb 27, 2026 $0.13; Mar 31, 2026 $0.13; Apr 30, 2026 $0.13; May 29, 2026 $0.13; Jun 30, 2026 $0.13; Jul 31, 2026 $0.13; Aug 28, 2026 $0.13; Sep 30, 2026 $0.13; Oct 30, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
RCLYAll RCLY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CLOC vs RCLY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CLOC 1.3%since Nov 2025RCLY No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CLOC 1.22since Nov 2025RCLY No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CLOC −0.5%since Oct 2025RCLY No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CLOC 0.07RCLY 0.09

Popular comparisons

  • CLOCBvsCLOAA

    AAM Crescent CLO ETF · iShares AAA CLO Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RCLYFvsCLOAA

    Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF · iShares AAA CLO Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CLOCBvsJAAAA

    AAM Crescent CLO ETF · Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RCLYFvsJAAAA

    Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF · Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CLOCBvsPAAAA

    AAM Crescent CLO ETF · PGIM AAA CLO ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RCLYFvsPAAAA

    Reckoner BBB-B CLO Annual ETF · PGIM AAA CLO ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.