SKYY ranks 2nd and CLOU 5th of 5 funds in the Cloud & Software Category.
CLOU vs SKYY
SKYY −0.08pt a year
0.68%0.60%
CLOU 1.4×the volume
368K255K
SKYY +9.3pt
−2.1%+7.2%
CLOU vs SKYY Performance
−9.9%+41.6%
- CLOU 0.68%
- SKYY 0.60%, better
- CLOU $399M
- SKYY $3.31B
- CLOU +16.3%, better
- SKYY +12.1%
- CLOU 0.00%
- SKYY 0.00%
- CLOU 38
- SKYY 66
- CLOU 368K sh, better
- SKYY 255K sh
- CLOU $28.06
- SKYY $159.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CLOU | SKYY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | D35Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | C41 | A74Higher |
| Durability | A71 | A85Higher |
Rank among Cloud & Software funds
Same Category. CLOU and SKYY are both graded against the same 5 Cloud & Software funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CLOUD
SKYYB
In short
CLOU Most cloud funds buy the software. CLOU also buys the buildings: its index reaches SaaS, PaaS and IaaS names plus data-center REITs and edge hardware, in a compact global basket. The wider net comes at a premium fee.
SKYY The veteran cloud play. SKYY has tracked the ISE CTA Cloud Computing Index since 2011, bundling roughly 60 companies that rent out computing power instead of selling boxes.
Stated mandate
CLOU The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index. The index covers companies positioned to benefit from cloud adoption through SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, managed storage, data-center REITs, and cloud or edge infrastructure and hardware.
SKYY The Fund seeks results generally corresponding, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield of the ISE CTA Cloud ComputingTM Index. The index is designed to track companies involved in the cloud computing industry.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CLOU vs SKYY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CLOU vs SKYY Cost
Overpaying CLOU vs SKYY
$1,435
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CLOU 0.68%
$13,252
SKYY 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CLOU | SKYY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,215 | $1,076 | $139 |
| 20 | $4,633 | $4,116 | $517 |
| 30 | $13,252 | $11,817 | $1,435 |
- 0.68%CLOU
- 0.60%SKYY, cheaper
- Middle half of Cloud & Software funds
- Median 0.45%
SKYY 4th cheapest of 5 funds
CLOU 5th cheapest of 5 funds
CLOU vs SKYY Dividends
- CLOU 0.00%
- SKYY 0.00%
- CLOU None
- SKYY None
Distribution history
CLOU vs SKYY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CLOU
- SKYY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CLOU 26.3%SKYY 26.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- CLOU 0.53SKYY 0.96, better
- Worst fall
- CLOU −53.8%SKYY −53.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CLOU 1.08SKYY 1.27
CLOU and SKYY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.68% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
