GIGB ranks 4th and CORP 23rd of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
CORP vs GIGB
GIGB −0.30pt a year
0.38%0.08%
CORP 1.4×the volume
117K83.7K
CORP +0.5pt
+0.3%−0.2%
CORP vs GIGB Performance
+1.6%−0.8%
- CORP 0.38%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- CORP $1.33B
- GIGB $1.04B
- CORP −0.4%, better
- GIGB −0.5%
- CORP 5.08%, better
- GIGB 4.77%
- CORP 1377
- GIGB 2719
- CORP 117K sh, better
- GIGB 83.7K sh
- CORP $93.33
- GIGB $44.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CORP | GIGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B57Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | C53 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | A74 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. CORP and GIGB are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CORPB
GIGBA
In short
CORP PIMCO is famous for active bond management. CORP is the opposite: since 2010 it has simply followed the ICE BofA US Corporate Index across roughly 1,400 investment grade corporate bonds, paying income monthly.
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
CORP The Fund seeks total return that closely follows the ICE BofA US Corporate Index before fees and expenses, normally investing at least 80% of assets in the index's component securities.
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CORP vs GIGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CORP vs GIGB Cost
Overpaying CORP vs GIGB
$6,017
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CORP 0.38%
$7,706
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CORP | GIGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $147 | $541 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $575 | $2,083 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $1,689 | $6,017 |
- 0.38%CORP
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
CORP 38th cheapest of 49 funds
CORP vs GIGB Dividends
- CORP 5.08%, better
- GIGB 4.77%
- CORP $4.75
- GIGB $2.12
- CORP $0.40
- GIGB $0.18
- CORP Oct 1, 2026
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- CORP Oct 5, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- CORP Monthly
- GIGB Monthly
Distribution history
CORP vs GIGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CORP
- GIGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CORP 6.2%, betterGIGB 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- CORP 0.34, betterGIGB 0.30
- Worst fall
- CORP −20.8%, betterGIGB −21.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CORP 1.03GIGB 1.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.