ISWN ranks 3rd and CPNM 7th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
CPNM vs ISWN
ISWN −0.20pt a year
0.69%0.49%
ISWN 2.6×the volume
7511.97K
CPNM vs ISWN Performance
+5.4%+2.4%
- CPNM 0.69%
- ISWN 0.49%, better
- CPNM $15M
- ISWN $35M
- CPNM +5.4%, better
- ISWN +2.4%
- CPNM
- ISWN 3.09%
- CPNM 3
- ISWN 14
- CPNM 751 sh
- ISWN 1.97K sh, better
- CPNM $27.16
- ISWN $21.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CPNM | ISWN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A83Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | F23 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | |
| Durability | C44 | A81Higher |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. CPNM and ISWN are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CPNMB
ISWNA
In short
CPNM Most buffer funds absorb the first 10% or 15% of a drop. This one is built to shield the entire Nasdaq-100 downside across its one-year period, and hands the upside back to you only up to a cap set at each reset.
ISWN Most downside-protection funds pay for the cushion by capping your upside. ISWN skips the cap: roughly 90% sits in Treasuries while about 10% buys long-dated in-the-money calls on EFA, so developed-market exposure arrives through options.
Stated mandate
CPNM The fund seeks exposure to the Nasdaq-100 with upside participation limited by a cap, while providing 100% capital protection over the one-year outcome period.
ISWN The fund seeks to track a rules-based index combining U.S. Treasury securities with EFA options. Its strategy targets approximately 90% Treasury exposure to cushion severe, rare market disruptions while retaining some participation in EFA gains.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CPNM vs ISWN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CPNM vs ISWN Cost
Overpaying CPNM vs ISWN
$3,637
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CPNM 0.69%
$13,429
ISWN 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CPNM | ISWN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $883 | $349 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $3,394 | $1,303 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $9,792 | $3,637 |
- 0.69%CPNM
- 0.49%ISWN, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
ISWN cheapest of 18 funds
CPNM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
CPNM vs ISWN Dividends
- CPNM
- ISWN 3.09%
- CPNM None
- ISWN $0.65
- CPNM
- ISWN $0.17
- CPNM
- ISWN Sep 29, 2026
- CPNM
- ISWN Sep 30, 2026
- CPNM
- ISWN Quarterly
Distribution history
CPNM vs ISWN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CPNM 2.0%ISWN 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CPNM 1.69ISWN 0.54
- Worst fall
- CPNM −1.9%ISWN −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CPNM 0.15ISWN 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.