ISWN ranks 3rd and CPNS 4th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
CPNS vs ISWN
ISWN −0.20pt a year
0.69%0.49%
CPNS 3.5×the volume
6.93K1.97K
CPNS vs ISWN Performance
+4.5%+2.4%
- CPNS 0.69%
- ISWN 0.49%, better
- CPNS $28M
- ISWN $35M
- CPNS +4.5%, better
- ISWN +2.4%
- CPNS
- ISWN 3.09%
- CPNS 3
- ISWN 14
- CPNS 6.93K sh, better
- ISWN 1.97K sh
- CPNS $28.44
- ISWN $21.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CPNS | ISWN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A91 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | C53 | |
| Durability | B60 | A81Higher |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. CPNS and ISWN are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CPNSA
ISWNA
In short
CPNS Armor, not a cushion. CPNS uses options on the Nasdaq-100 to target 100% protection from losses over a one-year outcome period, before fees, and pays for that shield with a hard cap on the upside that resets every September.
ISWN Most downside-protection funds pay for the cushion by capping your upside. ISWN skips the cap: roughly 90% sits in Treasuries while about 10% buys long-dated in-the-money calls on EFA, so developed-market exposure arrives through options.
Stated mandate
CPNS Seeks to provide positive price-return participation in the Nasdaq-100 up to a predetermined cap while protecting 100% of losses over the one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.
ISWN The fund seeks to track a rules-based index combining U.S. Treasury securities with EFA options. Its strategy targets approximately 90% Treasury exposure to cushion severe, rare market disruptions while retaining some participation in EFA gains.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CPNS vs ISWN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CPNS vs ISWN Cost
Overpaying CPNS vs ISWN
$3,637
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CPNS 0.69%
$13,429
ISWN 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CPNS | ISWN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $883 | $349 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $3,394 | $1,303 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $9,792 | $3,637 |
- 0.69%CPNS
- 0.49%ISWN, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
ISWN cheapest of 18 funds
CPNS 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
CPNS vs ISWN Dividends
- CPNS
- ISWN 3.09%
- CPNS None
- ISWN $0.65
- CPNS
- ISWN $0.17
- CPNS
- ISWN Sep 29, 2026
- CPNS
- ISWN Sep 30, 2026
- CPNS
- ISWN Quarterly
Distribution history
CPNS vs ISWN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CPNS 2.9%ISWN 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CPNS 0.67ISWN 0.54
- Worst fall
- CPNS −4.0%ISWN −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CPNS 0.21ISWN 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.