Skip to content
etf.net

CPRO vs XIJN

Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

CPROANYSE Arca

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June

XIJNBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CPRO −0.16pt a year

CPRO0.69%XIJN0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

XIJN 1.2×the volume

CPRO5.02KXIJN5.89K

CPRO vs XIJN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.3%CPRO+6.2%XIJN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CPRO +7.3%. XIJN +6.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%4%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CPRO 0.69%, better
XIJN 0.85%
Fund size
CPRO $27M
XIJN $50M
1Y total return
CPRO +7.3%, better
XIJN +6.2%
Yield (12M)
CPRO No data
XIJN 6.91%
Holdings
CPRO 3
XIJN 11
Avg volume (30D)
CPRO 5.02K sh
XIJN 5.89K sh, better
NAV per share
CPRO $28.89
XIJN $30.79
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CPRO: Cost 78, Risk 86, Mission 88, Tradability 70, Holdings not scored, Durability 63. XIJN: Cost 35, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 87, Holdings not scored, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for CPRO, XIJN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCPROXIJN
Cost30% weightA78HigherD35
Mission25% weightA88Not scored
Risk15% weightA86A94Higher
Tradability15% weightA70A87Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB63A83Higher

Rank among Other Floor Protected funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CPRO and XIJN are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Floor Protected⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

CPRO ranks 2nd and XIJN 7th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.

  1. Rank 1ACPRYCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – JanuaryScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACPROCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – OctoberScore 76
  3. Rank 3AISWNAmplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)Score 74
  4. Rank 7BCPNMCalamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – MarchScore 64
  5. Rank 7BXIJNFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - JuneScore 64
  6. Rank 9BFLJJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CPROACalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

XIJNBFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June

In short

CPRO Small-cap exposure without small-cap drawdowns: CPRO tracks the Russell 2000 and aims to shield 100% of capital across each one-year outcome period, trading away upside above a preset cap.

XIJN No data

Stated mandate

CPRO The ETF seeks to provide Russell 2000 exposure with defined upside participation while protecting 100% of capital from losses over the one-year outcome period.

XIJN No data

Why people hold it

  • CPRO Full armor, not a partial buffer: the design targets 100% downside protection over the one-year outcome period, versus the 9% or 15% slices typical of buffer funds.calamos.com
  • At 0.69%, it undercuts the typical fee in its downside-protection peer group, including RFLR, the other fund built on the same Russell 2000 floor idea.
  • Calamos brought the first 100% one-year protected Russell 2000 ETF to market, and CPRO is the October vintage; CPRY and CPRJ start their years in January and July.calamos.comprnewswire.com
  • A plain 1940 Act ETF you trade in a brokerage account, not a structured note bought through a bank.calamos.com

XIJN No data

Worth knowing

  • CPRO The cap is the price of the floor. It resets each October, applies before the 0.69% fee, and a big small-cap year gets trimmed to that ceiling.calamos.com
  • The math is built around holding the full October-to-September period. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and protection level remain.calamos.com
  • Small and thinly traded, so use limit orders. The options structure also isn't designed to produce an income stream.

XIJN No data

Full CPRO profile⁠

Full XIJN profile⁠

CPRO vs XIJN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CPRO vs XIJN Cost

Overpaying XIJN vs CPRO

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CPRO 0.69%

    $13,429

  • XIJN 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CPRO 0.69%
  • XIJN 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XIJN $16,199CPRO $13,429

Year by year

YearCPROXIJNOverpaying
10$1,232$1,508$276
20$4,697$5,706$1,009
30$13,429$16,199$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%CPRO, cheaper
  • 0.85%XIJN
  • Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
  • Median 0.79%

CPRO 2nd cheapest of 18 funds

XIJN 10th cheapest of 18 funds

CPRO vs XIJN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CPRO No data
XIJN 6.91%
Payout (12M)
CPRO None
XIJN $2.13
Last payment
CPRO No data
XIJN $0.17
Ex-dividend
CPRO No data
XIJN Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
CPRO No data
XIJN Oct 2, 2026
Frequency
CPRO No data
XIJN Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

CPROAll CPRO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XIJNMonthly · 27 paymentsAll XIJN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 27 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Aug 1, 2024 $0.17; Sep 3, 2024 $0.17; Oct 1, 2024 $0.17; Nov 1, 2024 $0.17; Dec 2, 2024 $0.17; Jan 2, 2025 $0.17; Feb 3, 2025 $0.17; Mar 3, 2025 $0.17; Apr 1, 2025 $0.17; May 1, 2025 $0.17; Jun 2, 2025 $0.17; Jun 20, 2025 $0.17; Aug 1, 2025 $0.18; Sep 2, 2025 $0.18; Oct 1, 2025 $0.18; Nov 3, 2025 $0.18; Dec 1, 2025 $0.18; Jan 2, 2026 $0.18; Feb 2, 2026 $0.18; Mar 2, 2026 $0.18; Apr 1, 2026 $0.18; May 1, 2026 $0.18; Jun 1, 2026 $0.18; Jun 18, 2026 $0.18; Aug 3, 2026 $0.17; Sep 1, 2026 $0.17; Oct 1, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

CPRO vs XIJN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CPRO 3.8%since Nov 2024XIJN 1.3%since Jul 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CPRO 0.94since Nov 2024XIJN 2.06since Jul 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CPRO −3.3%since Oct 2024XIJN −4.7%since Jun 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CPRO 0.21XIJN 0.08

Popular comparisons

  • CPROAvsCPRYA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XIJNBvsCPRYA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CPROAvsISWNA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October · Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XIJNBvsISWNA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June · Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CPROAvsCPNSA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October · Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – September

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XIJNBvsCPNSA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June · Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – September

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.