CPSL ranks 1st and MAXJ 3rd of 27 funds in the S&P 500 Full Protection Category.
CPSL vs MAXJ
0.0%by weight
CPSL −0.43pt a year
0.10%0.53%
MAXJ 1.00×the volume
37.4K37.6K
CPSL vs MAXJ Performance
+5.3%+5.8%
- CPSL 0.10%, better
- MAXJ 0.53%
- CPSL $163M
- MAXJ $163M
- CPSL +5.3%
- MAXJ +5.8%, better
- CPSL
- MAXJ 0.96%
- CPSL 13
- MAXJ 5
- CPSL 37.4K sh
- MAXJ 37.6K sh, better
- CPSL $28.38
- MAXJ $29.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CPSL | MAXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A83 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | A75 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | A93Higher | B58 |
| Durability | B69 | A88Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Full Protection funds
Same Category. CPSL and MAXJ are both graded against the same 27 S&P 500 Full Protection funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
CPSL vs MAXJ Holdings
How CPSL and MAXJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CPSL and 0.0% of MAXJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for CPSL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CPSLMore in MAXJ | CPSL | MAXJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | CPSL +0.4 points | 100.0% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | MAXJ +0.3 points | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| China | MAXJ +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CPSL83.3%
- MAXJ103.0%
- CPSL12
- MAXJ2
Asset class
- CPSL
- Equity
- MAXJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CPSL12
- In both0
- Only in MAXJ2
Only in CPSL
12 securities, 99.9% of CPSL by weight
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October8.38%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - November8.36%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December8.36%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - January8.34%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - February8.33%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August8.33%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March8.32%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April8.31%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July8.31%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September8.31%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May8.30%
- Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June8.29%
Only in MAXJ
2 securities, 100% of MAXJ by weight
- Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust98.19%
- JUL27 Ivv Us P @ 748.894.05%
Weight gaps
CPSL and MAXJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CPSL vs MAXJ Cost
Overpaying MAXJ vs CPSL
$8,430
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CPSL 0.10%
$2,106
MAXJ 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CPSL | MAXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $953 | $770 |
| 20 | $717 | $3,658 | $2,941 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $10,536 | $8,430 |
- 0.10%CPSL, cheaper
- 0.53%MAXJ
- Middle half of S&P 500 Full Protection funds
- Median 0.69%
CPSL cheapest of 27 funds
MAXJ 6th cheapest of 27 funds
CPSL vs MAXJ Dividends
- CPSL
- MAXJ 0.96%
- CPSL None
- MAXJ $0.28
- CPSL
- MAXJ $0.28
- CPSL
- MAXJ Dec 23, 2025
- CPSL
- MAXJ Dec 29, 2025
- CPSL
- MAXJ Annual
Distribution history
CPSL vs MAXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CPSL 2.3%MAXJ 4.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CPSL 0.65MAXJ 0.88
- Worst fall
- CPSL −3.7%MAXJ −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- CPSL 0.17MAXJ 0.30
CPSL and MAXJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

