Skip to content

CPSN vs TJUL

Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November

CPSNBNYSE Arca

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF

TJULCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CPSN −0.10pt a year

CPSN0.69%TJUL0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

TJUL 6.1×the volume

CPSN2.03KTJUL12.4K

CPSN vs TJUL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.1%CPSN+4.6%TJUL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CPSN +6.1%. TJUL +4.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CPSN 0.69%, better
TJUL 0.79%
Fund size
CPSN $34M
TJUL $114M
1Y total return
CPSN +6.1%, better
TJUL +4.6%
Holdings
CPSN 3
TJUL 3
Avg volume (30D)
CPSN 2.03K sh
TJUL 12.4K sh, better
NAV per share
CPSN $28.37
TJUL $30.79
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CPSN: Cost 62, Risk 58, Mission 88, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 54. TJUL: Cost 21, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings not scored, Durability 91.
Pillar letters and Scores for CPSN, TJUL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCPSNTJUL
Cost30% weightB62HigherF21
Mission25% weightA88Not scored
Risk15% weightB58HigherC52
Tradability15% weightB59B68Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC54A91Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Full Protection funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CPSN and TJUL are both graded against the same 27 S&P 500 Full Protection funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Full Protection⁠

Category · 27 funds
See all 27 ›

CPSN ranks 4th and TJUL 19th of 27 funds in the S&P 500 Full Protection Category.

  1. Rank 1ACPSLCalamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AMMAXiShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AMAXJiShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4BCPSNCalamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – NovemberScore 59
  5. Rank 5BCPNQCalamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - DecemberScore 56
  6. Rank 17CZJULInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr JulyScore 46
  7. Rank 19CTJULInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETFScore 44
  8. Rank 19CZFEBInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr FebruaryScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CPSNBCalamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November

TJULCInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETF

In short

CPSN A one-year airbag strapped to the S&P 500: CPSN aims to shield 100% of index price losses over its outcome period, before fees, in exchange for a hard cap on the upside that resets every November.

TJUL TJUL is the S&P 500 with a full airbag: a 100% downside buffer across a two-year outcome period, paid for with a hard ceiling on the upside. Total protection, not the usual thin slice, is the entire pitch.

Stated mandate

CPSN The fund seeks positive S&P 500 price-return exposure up to a defined cap while protecting against 100% of losses over its one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.

TJUL The Fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over the outcome period, subject to a maximum return cap and a 100% downside buffer before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • CPSN Aims to protect against 100% of S&P 500 price losses over its one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses. Not a partial buffer that can be used up.calamos.com
  • 0.69% expense ratio, level with the median for S&P 500 full-protection funds, and it sits in the upper half of that peer group overall.
  • Calamos runs the same structure across the calendar (CPSJ, CPSM, CPSP, CPSA), so a November start is one entry point among many rather than a single make-or-break date.
  • Every November a fresh one-year period opens with a newly set cap, so the terms re-price to current market conditions instead of locking in indefinitely.
  • TJUL The buffer goes all the way: the fund aims to absorb 100% of a decline in its S&P 500 reference over the outcome period, before fees and expenses.
  • Upside stays equity shaped. It tracks the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over the period up to a cap, so gains follow stocks rather than a fixed rate.
  • Long runway, clear terms: outcome periods run two years, with a new cap set at each reset, so the trade-off is spelled out in the fund's documents before the clock starts.
  • A registered 1940 Act fund holding an options-based defined outcome strategy, so the protection arrives inside a standard ETF wrapper rather than a note or annuity.

Worth knowing

  • CPSN The upside is capped, and the cap is reset each period from options pricing. Exposure is to S&P 500 price return, so index dividends are not part of the deal.calamos.com
  • The protection is stated before fees and expenses and applies to a full period held start to finish. Buy mid-period and your own cap and protection look different.calamos.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund inside a crowded family of monthly siblings. Spreads can be wider than at the household-name outcome ETFs, so limit orders matter.
  • TJUL Costs 0.79% a year, above the 0.69% charged by the Calamos protection series (CPSJ, CPSM), and the 100% buffer is measured before fees and expenses.
  • The cap is the price of the floor: strong S&P 500 stretches get trimmed at the ceiling, and buying mid-period leaves you with different terms than the stated cap and buffer.
  • Smaller and thinly traded next to plain index ETFs, so bid-ask spreads can widen in fast markets.

Full CPSN profile⁠

Full TJUL profile⁠

CPSN vs TJUL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CPSN vs TJUL Cost

Overpaying TJUL vs CPSN

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CPSN 0.69%

    $13,429

  • TJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CPSN 0.69%
  • TJUL 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TJUL $15,174CPSN $13,429

Year by year

YearCPSNTJULOverpaying
10$1,232$1,405$173
20$4,697$5,331$634
30$13,429$15,174$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%CPSN, cheaper
  • 0.79%TJUL
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Full Protection funds
  • Median 0.69%

CPSN 8th cheapest of 27 funds

TJUL 21st cheapest of 27 funds

CPSN vs TJUL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CPSN None
TJUL None

Distribution history

CPSNAll CPSN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TJULAll TJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CPSN vs TJUL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CPSN 2.4%since Dec 2024TJUL 3.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CPSN 0.82since Dec 2024TJUL 1.17
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CPSN −3.2%since Nov 2024TJUL −4.6%since Jul 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CPSN 0.18TJUL 0.24

CPSN and TJUL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CPSNBvsCPSLA

    Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November · Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TJULCvsCPSLA

    Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF · Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CPSNBvsMMAXA

    Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TJULCvsMMAXA

    Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CPSNBvsMAXJA

    Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF – November · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TJULCvsMAXJA

    Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF · iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.