UNHG ranks 2nd and CRD 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CRD vs UNHG
0.0%by weight
CRD −0.32pt a year
0.45%0.77%
UNHG 49.6×the volume
14.7K726K
CRD vs UNHG Performance
−60.8%−8.1%
- CRD 0.45%, better
- UNHG 0.77%
- CRD $1M
- UNHG $63M
- CRD
- UNHG +11.9%
- CRD 1
- UNHG 5
- CRD 14.7K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- CRD $7.10
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRD | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | B60 |
| Mission | A90 | |
| Risk | D33 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F21 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CRD and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRDC
UNHGA
In short
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRD vs UNHG Holdings
How CRD and UNHG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CRD and 0.0% of UNHG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for CRD and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CRDMore in UNHG | CRD | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- CRD197.8%
- UNHG212.0%
- CRD0
- UNHG1
Asset class
- CRD
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CRD0
- In both0
- Only in UNHG1
Only in CRD
0 securities, 0.0% of CRD by weight
Only in UNHG
1 security, 12.0% of UNHG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204011.99%
Weight gaps
CRD and UNHG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRD vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying UNHG vs CRD
$5,788
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRD 0.45%
$9,041
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRD | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,371 | $559 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,205 | $2,077 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,829 | $5,788 |
- 0.45%CRD, cheaper
- 0.77%UNHG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
CRD 7th cheapest of 315 funds
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
CRD vs UNHG Dividends
- CRD None
- UNHG
- CRD
- UNHG $1.90
- CRD
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- CRD
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- CRD
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
CRD vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRD UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRD UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CRD UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CRD 0.00UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.