UNHG ranks 1st and CRWL 110th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CRWL vs UNHG
UNHG −0.90pt a year
1.67%0.77%
UNHG 5.3×the volume
140K744K
CRWL vs UNHG Performance
+72.0%+18.8%
- CRWL 1.67%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- CRWL $47M
- UNHG $73M
- CRWL +72.0%, better
- UNHG +18.8%
- CRWL 2
- UNHG 6
- CRWL 140K sh
- UNHG 744K sh, better
- CRWL $65.96
- UNHG $19.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CRWL | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F2 | B61Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A91 |
| Risk | A74 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | A85 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A78Higher | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CRWL and UNHG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CRWLC
UNHGA
In short
CRWL A one-day trade on CrowdStrike. CRWL aims to deliver twice CRWD's daily move, resets every night, and makes no claim on any longer stretch. GraniteShares has run it since 2024, and it has stayed close to that 2x daily target.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
CRWL The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of CrowdStrike Holdings Inc.'s common stock, before fees and expenses. The objective is measured daily and is not intended to track twice the cumulative return over periods longer than one day.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CRWL vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CRWL vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying CRWL vs UNHG
$13,808
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CRWL 1.67%
$28,637
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CRWL | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,863 | $1,371 | $1,492 |
| 20 | $10,445 | $5,205 | $5,240 |
| 30 | $28,637 | $14,829 | $13,808 |
- 1.67%CRWL
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
CRWL 305th cheapest of 312 funds
CRWL vs UNHG Dividends
- CRWL None
- UNHG
- CRWL
- UNHG $1.90
- CRWL
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- CRWL
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- CRWL
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
CRWL vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CRWL 134.1%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CRWL 0.90UNHG 0.90Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- CRWL −65.0%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CRWL 4.67UNHG 5.19
CRWL and UNHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.67% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.67% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.67% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
